10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 8, 2011
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2011
Commission File Number: 0-31285
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 91-1033443 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2630 South Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92704
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(714) 327-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, of registrant outstanding at August
3, 2011: 81,331,886
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
June 27, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 235,898 | $ | 216,078 | ||||
Available for sale securities |
4,354 | | ||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $1,743 in 2011 and $1,827
in 2010 |
294,615 | 287,703 | ||||||
Inventories |
141,152 | 135,385 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
32,639 | 30,125 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,208 | 7,208 | ||||||
Total current assets |
715,866 | 676,499 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $167,847 in 2011 and $135,565
in 2010 |
736,548 | 740,630 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,685 | 23,733 | ||||||
Goodwill |
197,662 | 197,808 | ||||||
Definite-lived intangibles, net |
89,155 | 97,873 | ||||||
Deposits and other non-current assets |
28,071 | 25,409 | ||||||
$ | 1,786,987 | $ | 1,761,952 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term
debt, including current portion of long-term debt, net of discount |
$ | 123,171 | $ | 67,123 | ||||
Accounts payable |
167,062 | 154,600 | ||||||
Accounts payable due to related parties |
47,403 | 50,374 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
45,043 | 51,107 | ||||||
Equipment payable |
69,019 | 59,802 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
35,462 | 35,194 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
487,160 | 418,200 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes, net of discount |
148,157 | 145,283 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
255,836 | 312,995 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
16,425 | 12,608 | ||||||
Related party financing obligation |
| 20,399 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
11,915 | 19,609 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
432,333 | 510,894 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 81,332 and 80,262 shares issued and
outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
81 | 80 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
531,584 | 519,051 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
200,034 | 193,814 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
27,004 | 15,310 | ||||||
Total TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders equity |
758,703 | 728,255 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
108,791 | 104,603 | ||||||
Total equity |
867,494 | 832,858 | ||||||
$ | 1,786,987 | $ | 1,761,952 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
For the Quarter and Two Quarters Ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
For the Quarter and Two Quarters Ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 366,117 | $ | 310,248 | $ | 708,918 | $ | 448,467 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
288,782 | 253,154 | 549,657 | 364,400 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
77,335 | 57,094 | 159,261 | 84,067 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
9,323 | 9,103 | 18,356 | 15,830 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
24,111 | 25,349 | 47,162 | 34,386 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
4,321 | 4,621 | 8,479 | 5,412 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 399 | | 449 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
48,125 | 266 | 48,125 | 766 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
85,880 | 39,738 | 122,122 | 56,843 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(8,545 | ) | 17,356 | 37,139 | 27,224 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(6,684 | ) | (6,411 | ) | (12,975 | ) | (9,192 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
3,435 | 181 | 4,412 | 173 | ||||||||||||
Total other expense, net |
(3,249 | ) | (6,230 | ) | (8,563 | ) | (9,019 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(11,794 | ) | 11,126 | 28,576 | 18,205 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision |
(8,474 | ) | (4,386 | ) | (19,756 | ) | (6,980 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(20,268 | ) | 6,740 | 8,820 | 11,225 | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(635 | ) | (1,811 | ) | (2,600 | ) | (1,811 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc.
stockholders |
$ | (20,903 | ) | $ | 4,929 | $ | 6,220 | $ | 9,414 | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to TTM |
||||||||||||||||
Technologies, Inc. stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | |||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Two Quarters Ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Two Quarters Ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010
Two Quarters Ended | ||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,820 | $ | 11,225 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
32,521 | 17,182 | ||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets |
8,538 | 5,470 | ||||||
Amortization of convertible notes, debt discount and debt issuance costs |
3,728 | 3,159 | ||||||
Non-cash interest imputed on other long-term liabilities and related party financing
obligation |
628 | 270 | ||||||
Income tax benefit from restricted stock units released and common stock options exercised |
(1,956 | ) | (436 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,155 | 3,471 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,879 | 3,006 | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
48,125 | 766 | ||||||
Realized gain on early payment of related party financing obligation |
(1,659 | ) | | |||||
Net loss on sale of property, plant and equipment and other |
269 | 152 | ||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivative assets and liabilities |
697 | 73 | ||||||
Net realized foreign currency exchange loss |
1,280 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
(6,464 | ) | (35,499 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(5,614 | ) | (1,114 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,899 | ) | (6,180 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
10,692 | 14,076 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits and other accrued expenses |
(6,885 | ) | 4,129 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
104,855 | 19,750 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and equipment deposits |
(70,963 | ) | (18,294 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale |
364 | 3,478 | ||||||
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
| (28,529 | ) | |||||
Restricted cash used for acquisition |
| 120,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from the redemption of short-term investments |
| 1,351 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(70,599 | ) | 78,006 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from revolving loan |
20,000 | 20,014 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term borrowings |
(32,120 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
10,822 | 387,980 | ||||||
Repayment of assumed long-term debt in acquisition |
| (387,980 | ) | |||||
Settlement of related party financing obligation |
(20,528 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
6,264 | 197 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock awards exercised or released |
1,956 | 436 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(13,606 | ) | 20,647 | |||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(830 | ) | 436 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
19,820 | 118,839 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
216,078 | 94,347 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 235,898 | $ | 213,186 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities:
The Company issued common stock and replacement awards with a fair value of $294,382 in connection
with the PCB Subsidiaries acquisition. See Note 2.
At June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 accrued purchases of equipment totaled $75,840 and $27,400,
respectively.
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(1) Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
TTM Technologies, Inc. (the Company or TTM) is a leading global provider of time-critical and
technologically complex printed circuit board (PCB) products and backplane assemblies (PCBs
populated with electronic components), which serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic
products. The Company provides advanced technology products and offers a one-stop manufacturing
solution to customers from engineering support to prototype development through final volume
production. The Company serves a diversified customer base in various markets throughout the world,
including manufacturers of networking/communications infrastructure products, personal computers,
touch screen tablets and mobile media devices (cellular phones and smart phones). The Company also
serves high-end computing, commercial aerospace/defense, and industrial/medical industries. The
Companys customers include both original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and electronic
manufacturing services (EMS) providers.
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared by the
Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated
condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial
position, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. It is
suggested that these consolidated condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The preparation of financial statements
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Companys consolidated condensed
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. The Company uses a 13-week fiscal quarter accounting period with the first quarter
ending on the last Monday in March and the fourth quarter always ending on December 31. The second
quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 each contained 91 days. The two quarters ended June
27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 contained 178 and 179 days, respectively.
(2) Acquisition of PCB Subsidiaries
On the evening of April 8, 2010 (in the morning of April 9, 2010, Hong Kong time), the Company
acquired from Meadville Holdings Limited (Meadville), an exempted company incorporated under the
laws of the Cayman Islands, and MTG Investment (BVI) Limited (MTG), a company incorporated under
the laws of the British Virgin Islands and a wholly owned subsidiary of Meadville, all of the
issued and outstanding capital stock of four wholly owned subsidiaries of MTG. These four
companies, through their respective subsidiaries, engage in the business of manufacturing and
distributing printed circuit boards, including circuit design, quick-turn-around services, and
drilling and routing services. Subsequent to the acquisition, these four companies and their
subsidiaries (together, the PCB Subsidiaries) are subsidiaries of the Company and represent the
Asia Pacific operating segment of the Company.
The Company purchased the PCB Subsidiaries for a total consideration of $114,034 in cash and
36,334 shares of TTM common stock, of which approximately 26,225 are subject to restrictions. After
taking into account the 36,334 shares of TTM common stock issued in the acquisition and based on
the number of shares outstanding on April 8, 2010, the date the Company acquired the PCB
Subsidiaries, approximately 45% of TTM common stock outstanding was held by Meadville, its
shareholders, or their transferees.
The purchase price of the PCB Subsidiaries was allocated to tangible and intangible assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests based on their estimated fair value at
the date of the acquisition (April 8, 2010). Noncontrolling interests consist of a 29.8% equity
interest in one PCB manufacturing subsidiary and a 20.0% equity interest in one other PCB
manufacturing subsidiary held by third parties. The fair value was determined by utilizing a
combination of income and market comparable approaches. The income approach was used to estimate
the total enterprise value of each noncontrolling interest by estimating discounted future cash
flows. The market comparable approach indicates the fair value of the noncontrolling interest based
on a comparison to comparable enterprises in similar lines of business that are publicly traded or
are part of a public or private transaction.
6
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Bank fees and legal and accounting costs associated with the acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries of $6,986 and $8,784 for the quarter and two quarters ended June 28, 2010 have been
expensed and recorded as general and administrative expense in the consolidated condensed statement
of operations in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. There were no bank fees or
legal and accounting costs associated with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries for the quarter
or two quarters ended June 27, 2011.
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the Company, assuming the acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries occurred on January 1, 2010 are as follows:
For the Quarter | For the Two Quarters | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 28, 2010 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 334,776 | $ | 631,311 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 9,784 | $ | 15,955 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
Dilutive earnings per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been
achieved had the PCB Subsidiaries acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2010, or the results that
may be achieved in future periods.
(3) Long-lived Assets
Property, plant and equipment, net as of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the
following:
June 27, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net: |
||||||||
Land and land use rights |
$ | 36,924 | $ | 36,444 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
209,530 | 204,850 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
504,187 | 477,886 | ||||||
Construction-in-progress |
144,974 | 149,123 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
7,215 | 6,440 | ||||||
Automobiles |
1,565 | 1,452 | ||||||
904,395 | 876,195 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(167,847 | ) | (135,565 | ) | ||||
$ | 736,548 | $ | 740,630 | |||||
During the quarter ended June 27, 2011, the Company recorded an impairment
charge in the amount of $48,125 to reduce the carrying value of certain long-lived
assets in the Asia Pacific operating segment.
The impairment charge is comprised of $39,850 related to manufacturing equipment held for use at a plant acquired by Meadville in
2007 for which the Company had previously reduced the carrying value of certain of these assets during its purchase price allocation
completed in 2010 related to the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. Weaker than expected operating performance at this
manufacturing plant in the first six months of 2011 resulting from a downturn in the profitability of the products produced at this
manufacturing plant and a reduction in expected future demand for the specific products produced resulted in a triggering event during
the quarter ended June 27, 2011. Based on the undiscounted cash flows
for this plant, an impairment of the manufacturing assets
was indicated. The Companys asset grouping for the impairment test was the manufacturing plant as the manufacturing equipment at
this plant is specific to the products produced with separately identifiable cash flows. In addition, the manufacturing equipment at this
plant cannot be used at the Companys other manufacturing sites. The fair value of these manufacturing assets was determined using a
discounted cash flow model over their remaining useful life with the impairment being the difference between the carrying value and
fair value of the asset group. The impairment charge is also
comprised of $8,275 related to manufacturing equipment that, due to the
change in market conditions noted above, has become or is expected to become technologically obsolete. Accordingly, during the quarter ended June 27,
2011, the Company revised its classification of these assets to held for sale or disposal. The fair value of these assets
was determined using third party quotes or other estimates of salvage value and the assets carrying value was written down to salvage
value. The new carrying value of the assets held for sale or disposal
is approximately $1,003, which is included in machinery and equipment
in property, plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet.
Additionally, during the quarter and two quarters ended June 28, 2010, the Company reduced the
carrying value of the Dallas, Oregon facility, which was classified as an asset held for sale, to
record the estimated fair value less costs to sell, resulting in an impairment of $266 and $766,
respectively, due to a depressed real estate market in the surrounding Dallas, Oregon region. The
Company sold the Dallas, Oregon facility in July 2010.
7
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
(4) Accounts and Notes Receivable Factoring and Sales Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Companys foreign subsidiaries utilize accounts
receivable factoring arrangements. Under these arrangements, the Company may sell certain of its
accounts receivable to financial institutions, which are accounted for as a sale, at a discount
ranging from 1% to 2% of the accounts receivable. In all arrangements there is no recourse against
the Company for its customers failure to pay. The Company sold $20,169 and $16,061 of accounts
receivable for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively, and $34,430 and
$16,061 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively.
Additionally, the Companys foreign subsidiaries may also sell certain of their notes
receivable at a discount ranging from 1% to 2% of the notes receivable. The Company sold $13,277
and $29,052 of notes receivable for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively,
and $39,566 and $29,052 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively.
(5) Inventories
Inventories as of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the following:
June 27, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 48,638 | $ | 50,465 | ||||
Work-in-process |
53,427 | 47,178 | ||||||
Finished goods |
39,087 | 37,742 | ||||||
$ | 141,152 | $ | 135,385 | |||||
(6) Goodwill and Definite-lived Intangibles
As of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, goodwill by operating segment and the components of
definite-lived intangibles were as follows:
Goodwill
North | Asia | |||||||||||
America | Pacific | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 131,650 | $ | 183,176 | $ | 314,826 | ||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(117,018 | ) | | (117,018 | ) | |||||||
14,632 | 183,176 | 197,808 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustment during the two
quarters ended June 27, 2011 |
279 | (425 | ) | (146 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of June 27, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
131,929 | $ | 182,751 | 314,680 | ||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(117,018 | ) | | (117,018 | ) | |||||||
$ | 14,911 | $ | 182,751 | $ | 197,662 | |||||||
The December 31, 2010 goodwill balance includes foreign currency translation adjustments
related to foreign subsidiaries which operate in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.
8
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Definite-lived Intangibles
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | Net | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Accumulated | Currency | Carrying | Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Rate Change | Amount | Period | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (years) | |||||||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic customer relationships |
$ | 120,427 | $ | (39,536 | ) | $ | 70 | $ | 80,961 | 9.2 | ||||||||||
Trade name |
10,302 | (2,187 | ) | (27 | ) | 8,088 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||
Licensing agreements |
350 | (244 | ) | | 106 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||
Order backlog |
1,288 | (1,286 | ) | (2 | ) | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
$ | 132,367 | $ | (43,253 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | 89,155 | ||||||||||||
All of the definite-lived intangibles are amortized using the straight line method of
amortization over the useful life, with the exception of the strategic customer relationship
intangibles, which are amortized using an accelerated method of amortization based on estimated
cash flows. Amortization expense was $4,350 and $4,650 for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and
June 28, 2010, respectively, and $8,538 and $5,470 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and
June 28, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense related to acquired licensing agreements is
classified as cost of goods sold.
Estimated aggregate amortization for definite-lived intangible assets for the next five years
is as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Remaining 2011 |
$ | 8,925 | ||
2012 |
16,519 | |||
2013 |
15,524 | |||
2014 |
13,947 | |||
2015 |
12,472 | |||
$ | 67,387 | |||
(7) Long-term Debt and Letters of Credit
The following table summarizes the long-term debt of the Company as of June 27, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Average Effective | Average Effective | |||||||||||||||
Interest Rate | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||
as of | as of | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 27, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Bank loans, due various dates |
||||||||||||||||
through June 2013 |
3.70 | % | $ | 26,687 | 3.39 | % | $ | 30,412 | ||||||||
Term loan due November 2013 |
2.19 | % | 332,500 | 2.26 | % | 350,000 | ||||||||||
Revolving loan |
2.44 | % | 20,000 | | | |||||||||||
Other |
6.00 | % | 18 | 6.00 | % | 20 | ||||||||||
379,205 | 380,432 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Unamortized discount |
(198 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||||||||||
379,007 | 380,118 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Current maturities |
(123,171 | ) | (67,123 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
$ | 255,836 | $ | 312,995 | ||||||||||||
The maturities of long-term debt through 2013 and thereafter are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Remaining 2011 |
$ | 55,002 | ||
2012 |
120,869 | |||
2013 |
203,326 | |||
Thereafter |
8 | |||
$ | 379,205 | |||
9
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Bank loans are made up of bank lines of credit in mainland China and are used for working
capital and capital investment for the Companys mainland China facilities. These facilities are
denominated in either U.S. Dollars or Chinese Renminbi (RMB), with interest rates tied to either
LIBOR or Peoples Bank of China rates. These bank loans expire at various dates through June 2013.
On April 9, 2010, in conjunction with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, the Company
became a party to a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) entered into on November 16, 2009 by
certain PCB Subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement consists of a $350,000 senior secured term loan
(Term Loan), a $87,500 senior secured revolving loan (Revolving Loan), a $65,000 factoring facility
(Factoring Facility), and a $80,000 letters of credit facility (Letters of Credit Facility), all of
which mature on November 16, 2013. The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the
assets of the PCB Subsidiaries. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the full and punctual
payment of all obligations of the PCB Subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (term election
by Company) plus an applicable interest margin. Borrowings under the Term Loan will bear interest
at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.0%, LIBOR plus 2.25% under the Revolving Loan, and LIBOR plus 1.25% under
the Factoring Facility. There is no provision, other than an event of default, for these interest
margins to increase. At June 27, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding
borrowings under the Credit Agreement was 2.20%.
The Company is required to make scheduled payments of the outstanding Term Loan balance
beginning in 2011. All and any other outstanding balances under the Credit Agreement are due at the
maturity date of November 16, 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are subject to certain
financial and operating covenants that include, among other provisions, limitations on dividends or
other distributions, maintaining maximum total leverage ratios and minimum net worth, current
assets, and interest coverage ratios at both the Company and PCB Subsidiaries level. The Company is
in compliance with the covenants.
The Company is also required to pay a commitment fee of 0.20% per annum on the unused portion
of any loan or facility under the Credit Agreement. For the quarter and two quarters ended June 27,
2011, the Company incurred $77 and $153, respectively, in commitment fees related to unused
borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement. As of June 27, 2011, all of the remaining Term
Loan was outstanding, $20,000 of the Revolving Loan was outstanding, none of the Factoring Facility
was outstanding, and $65,114 of the Letters of Credit Facility was outstanding. Available borrowing
capacity under the Revolving Loan and Factoring Facility was $67,500 and $65,000, respectively, at
June 27, 2011.
On April 9, 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate swap arrangement with an initial
notional amount of $146,500 for the period beginning April 18,
2011 and ending on April 16, 2013
(see Note 11).
Other Letters of Credit
In addition to the letters of credit obtained by the PCB Subsidiaries pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, the Company maintains several unused letters of credit: a $1,994 standby letter of
credit expiring December 31, 2011 associated with its insured workers compensation program; a
$1,000 standby letter of credit expiring February 29, 2012 related to the lease of one of its
production facilities; and various other letters of credit aggregating to approximately $1,661
related to purchases of machinery and equipment with various expiration dates through July 2011.
(8) Convertible Senior Notes
In 2008, the Company issued 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes (Convertible Notes) due May 15,
2015 in a public offering for an aggregate principal amount of $175,000. The Convertible Notes
bear interest at a rate of 3.25% per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on May 15
and November 15 of each year. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally to the Companys future unsecured senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any
of the Companys future subordinated indebtedness. The liability and equity components of the
Convertible Notes are separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the Companys
non-convertible debt borrowing rate when interest costs are recognized.
10
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company has allocated the Convertible Notes offering costs to the liability and equity
components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds and accounted for them as debt issuance
costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. At June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
following summarizes the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes:
June 27, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Liability components: |
||||||||
Convertible Notes |
$ | 175,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||
Less: Convertible Notes unamortized discount |
(26,843 | ) | (29,717 | ) | ||||
Convertible Notes, net of discount |
$ | 148,157 | $ | 145,283 | ||||
Equity components: |
||||||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Embedded conversion option Convertible Notes |
$ | 43,000 | $ | 43,000 | ||||
Embedded conversion option Convertible Notes issuance costs |
(1,413 | ) | (1,413 | ) | ||||
$ | 41,587 | $ | 41,587 | |||||
At June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, remaining unamortized debt issuance costs included in
other non-current assets were $2,708 and $2,998, respectively. The debt issuance costs and debt
discount are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes using the
effective interest rate method. At June 27, 2011, the remaining amortization period for the
unamortized Convertible Note discount and debt issuance costs was 3.9 years.
The components of interest expense resulting from the Convertible Notes for the quarter and
two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 are as follows:
For the Quarter Ended | For the Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual coupon interest |
$ | 1,422 | $ | 1,422 | $ | 2,844 | $ | 2,844 | ||||||||
Amortization of Convertible Notes debt discount |
1,452 | 1,335 | 2,874 | 2,644 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
147 | 135 | 290 | 266 | ||||||||||||
$ | 3,021 | $ | 2,892 | $ | 6,008 | $ | 5,754 | |||||||||
For the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, the amortization of
the Convertible Notes debt discount and debt issuance costs is based on an effective interest rate
of 8.37%.
Conversion
At any time prior to November 15, 2014, holders may convert their Convertible Notes into cash
and, if applicable, into shares of the Companys common stock based on a conversion rate of 62.6449
shares of the Companys common stock per $1 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to
adjustment, under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter beginning after June
30, 2008 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common
stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the
applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day of such preceding calendar quarter; (2)
during the five business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the
trading price per note for each day of that 10 consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of
the product of the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock and the conversion rate
on such day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions described in the
prospectus supplement. As of June 27, 2011, none of the conversion criteria had been met.
On or after November 15, 2014 until the close of business on the third scheduled trading day
preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, for each $1 principal amount of notes, the Company will
pay cash for the lesser of the conversion value or $1 and shares of our common stock, if any, based
on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for each day of the 60 trading day
observation period. Additionally, in the event
11
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
of a fundamental change as defined in the prospectus supplement, or other conversion rate
adjustments such as share splits or combinations, other distributions of shares, cash or other
assets to stockholders, including self-tender transactions (Other Conversion Rate Adjustments), the
conversion rate may be modified to adjust the number of shares per $1 principal amount of the
notes. As of June 27, 2011, none of the criteria for a fundamental change or a conversion rate
adjustment had been met.
The maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion, including the effect of a fundamental
change and subject to Other Conversion Rate Adjustments, would be 13,978.
Note Repurchase
The Company is not permitted to redeem the Convertible Notes at any time prior to maturity. In
the event of a fundamental change or certain default events, as defined in the prospectus
supplement, holders may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their
Convertible Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transaction
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into a
convertible note hedge and warrant transaction (Call Spread Transaction), with respect to the
Companys common stock. The convertible note hedge, which cost an aggregate of $38,257 and was
recorded, net of tax, as a reduction of additional paid-in capital, consists of the Companys
option to purchase up to 10,963 shares of common stock at a price of $15.96 per share. This option
expires on May 15, 2015 and can only be executed upon the conversion of the above mentioned
Convertible Notes. Additionally, the Company sold warrants to purchase 10,963 shares of its common
stock at a price of $18.15 per share. The warrants expire ratably beginning August 2015 through
February 2016. Proceeds from the sale of warrants of $26,197 were recorded as an addition to additional paid-in
capital. The Call Spread Transaction has no effect on the terms of the Convertible Notes and
reduces potential dilution by effectively increasing the conversion price of the Convertible Notes
to $18.15 per share of the Companys common stock.
(9) Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
The
following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income
(loss) for the quarter and two
quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010:
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (20,268 | ) | $ | 6,740 | $ | 8,820 | $ | 11,225 | |||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax expense
of $174 and $69 for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and
June 28, 2010, respectively, and net of tax of $238 and $69
for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010,
respectively. |
8,154 | 2,388 | 10,968 | 2,388 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities |
1,648 | | 1,648 | | ||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on effective cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on effective cash flow
hedges, net of tax (benefit) of $(56) and $380 for the
quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010,
respectively, and net of tax (benefit) of $(94) and $380
for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010,
respectively. |
(63 | ) | (1,924 | ) | 554 | (1,924 | ) | |||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses realized in
net earnings net of tax of $0 for the quarter and two
quarters ended June 27, 2011 |
113 | | 113 | | ||||||||||||
Net |
50 | (1,924 | ) | 667 | (1,924 | ) | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax |
9,852 | 464 | 13,283 | 464 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(10,416 | ) | 7,204 | 22,103 | 11,689 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(1,880 | ) | (2,253 | ) | (4,189 | ) | (2,253 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to TTM
Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
$ | (12,296 | ) | $ | 4,951 | $ | 17,914 | $ | 9,436 | |||||||
12
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
The following provides a summary of the activity associated with the designated cash flow
hedges reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income for the two quarters ended June 27,
2011:
June 27, 2011 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2010, net of tax |
$ | (3,121 | ) | |
Changes in fair value gain, net of tax |
554 | |||
Reclassification
of losses to earnings, net of tax |
113 | |||
Ending balance as of June 27, 2011, net of tax |
$ | (2,454 | ) | |
The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income for the cash flow hedge related
to the interest rate swap are reclassified into interest expense during the operative period of the
swap, beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013, and in the same period in which the
related interest on the floating-rate debt obligation affects earnings. The Company expects that
approximately $2,051 will be reclassified into the statement of operations, net of tax, in the next
12 months.
(10) Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 71.9% and 39.4% for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and
June 28, 2010, respectively and 69.1% and 38.3% for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June
28, 2010, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate changed primarily due to the impact of an
impairment charge, for which a tax benefit was not recorded, partially offset by an increase in total earnings
generated in lower-tax jurisdictions resulting from the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. The
Companys effective tax rate will generally differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due
to favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings from the Companys operations in lower-tax
jurisdictions in China. Certain foreign losses generated are not more than likely to be realizable,
and thus, no income tax benefit has been recognized on these losses. The Companys foreign earnings
attributable to the Asia Pacific operating segment will be permanently reinvested in such foreign
jurisdictions and, therefore, no deferred tax liabilities for U.S. income taxes on undistributed
earnings are recorded.
(11) Financial Instruments
Derivatives
Interest Rate Swaps
The Companys business is exposed to interest rate risk resulting from fluctuations in
interest rates on certain variable rate LIBOR and Peoples Bank of China debt. Increases in interest rates would increase
interest expenses relating to the outstanding variable rate borrowings of certain foreign
subsidiaries and increase the cost of debt. Fluctuations in interest rates can also lead to
significant fluctuations in the fair value of the debt obligations.
On April 9, 2010, the Company entered into a two-year pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month
LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial notional amount of $146,500, for
the period beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013. The interest rate swap will apply
a fixed interest rate against the first interest payments of a portion of the $350,000 Term Loan
over the term of the interest rate swap. As part of the Companys risk management strategy, the
Company chose not to hedge its initial year interest payment cash flows of its Term Loan because of
low LIBOR rates at inception, which would have initially resulted in locking in a fixed rate higher
than LIBOR spot rate at the onset.
The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases to zero over its term, consistent with
the Companys risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at June 27, 2011
was $146,500. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will pay a fixed rate of 2.50%
and will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. The Company has designated this
interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
At inception, the fair value of the interest rate swap was zero. As of June 27, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded as a liability of $3,994 and $3,421,
respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change in the fair value of the interest rate
swap is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, in the
Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet. No ineffectiveness was recognized for the quarter
or two quarters ended June 27, 2011. During the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011, the
interest rate swap increased interest expense by $664.
13
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Additionally, the Company, through its acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, assumed a long
term pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an
initial notional amount of $40,000, for the period beginning October 8, 2008 and ending on July 30,
2012. This interest rate swap applied to the PCB Subsidiaries pre-acquisition, long-term
borrowings, which were paid-off on the acquisition date. The notional amount of the interest rate
swap decreases to zero over its term. The notional value at June 27, 2011 was $34,000. Under the
terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will pay a fixed rate of 3.43% and will receive
floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. As the borrowings attributable to this interest rate
swap were paid off upon acquisition, the Company did not designate this interest rate swap as a
cash flow hedge. As of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded
as a liability of $826 and $1,206, respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change in the
fair value of this interest rate swap is recorded as Other, net in the consolidated condensed
statement of operations.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates and to reduce the volatility of purchases and other obligations
generated in currencies other than the functional currencies. Our foreign subsidiaries may at times
purchase forward exchange contracts to manage their foreign currency risks in relation to
particular purchases or obligations, such as the related party financing obligation arising from
the put call option to purchase the remaining 20% of a majority owned subsidiary in 2013, which was
settled in early June 2011 when the put call option was settled
in cash (see Note 20), and certain
purchases of machinery denominated in foreign currencies other than the Companys foreign
functional currency. The notional amount of the foreign exchange contracts at June 27, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was approximately $40,528 and $36,266, respectively. The Company has designated
certain of these foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, with the exception of the foreign
exchange contracts in relation to the related party financing obligation, which was recently settled
in June 2011. In this instance, the hedged item was a recognized liability subject to foreign
currency transaction gains and losses and, therefore, changes in the hedged item due to foreign
currency exchange rates were recorded in earnings. Therefore, hedge accounting was not applied.
The fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated condensed balance sheet are as
follows:
Asset / (Liability) Fair | ||||||||||||
Value | ||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | June 27, | December 31, | ||||||||||
Location | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash flow derivative instruments designated as hedges: |
||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 62 | $ | | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Deposits and other non-current assets | 717 | 9 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other accrued expenses | (10 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other long-term liabilities | | (272 | ) | ||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Other long-term liabilities | (3,994 | ) | (3,421 | ) | |||||||
Cash flow derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 237 | 482 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Deposits and other non-current assets | | 728 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other accrued expenses | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap |
Other long-term liabilities | (826 | ) | (1,206 | ) | |||||||
$ | (3,819 | ) | $ | (3,685 | ) | |||||||
14
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
The following tables provide information about the amounts recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges as well as the amounts
recorded in each caption in the consolidated condensed statement of operations when derivative
amounts are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income:
For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion |
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain/(Loss) | Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial | Recognized in Other |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Recognized in Other |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Gain/(Loss) Recognized |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement Caption |
Comprehensive Income |
into Income |
into Income |
Comprehensive Income |
into Income |
into Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Interest expense | $ | (338 | ) | $ | (664 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,283 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward |
Other, net | 219 | | | (21 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | (119 | ) | $ | (664 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,304 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
For the Two Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion |
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain/(Loss) | Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial | Recognized in Other |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Recognized in Other |
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified |
Gain/(Loss) Recognized |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement Caption |
Comprehensive Income |
into Income |
into Income |
Comprehensive Income |
into Income |
into Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Interest expense | $ | (573 | ) | $ | (664 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,283 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward |
Other, net | 1,033 | | | (21 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 460 | $ | (664 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,304 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
The gain (loss) recognized in other, net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations
on derivative instruments not designated as hedges is as follows:
For the Quarter Ended | For the Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | 212 | $ | 51 | $ | 378 | $ | 51 | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
(139 | ) | (1,630 | ) | 782 | (1,630 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 73 | $ | (1,579 | ) | $ | 1,160 | $ | (1,579 | ) | |||||||
15
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments at June
27, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
June 27, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
$ | 4,354 | $ | 4,354 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative assets, current |
299 | 299 | 482 | 482 | ||||||||||||
Derivative
liabilities, current |
15 | 15 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Derivative
assets, non-current |
717 | 717 | 737 | 737 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities, non-current |
4,820 | 4,820 | 4,899 | 4,899 | ||||||||||||
Long-term equity investment |
| | 2,714 | 2,280 | ||||||||||||
Related party financing obligation |
| | 20,399 | 20,791 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
379,007 | 377,811 | 380,118 | 370,812 | ||||||||||||
Convertible senior notes |
148,157 | 214,165 | 145,283 | 207,508 |
The fair value of available for sale securities was determined using quoted market prices for
the securities on an active exchange.
The fair value of the derivative instruments was determined using pricing models developed
based on the LIBOR swap rate, foreign currency exchange rates, and other observable market data,
including quoted market prices, as appropriate. The values were adjusted to reflect nonperformance
risk of both the counterparty and the Company.
The fair value of equity securities accounted for under the cost method (nonmarketable equity
securities) was estimated using market multiples derived from comparable companies. Under that
approach, the identification of comparable companies requires significant judgment. Additionally,
multiples might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable company. The selection
of where the appropriate multiple falls within that range also requires significant judgment,
considering both qualitative and quantitative factors.
The fair value of the related party financing obligation was estimated based on the minimum
price of the obligation plus 2.5% interest discounted at the liabilitys discount rate based on the
Companys adjusted cost of borrowing.
The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated based on discounting the par value of the
debt over its life for the difference between the debt stated interest rate and current market
rates for similar debt at June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The fair value of the convertible senior notes was estimated based on quoted market prices of
the securities on an active exchange.
At June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys financial instruments included cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and equipment payables.
Due to short-term maturities, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value.
(12) Significant Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys customers include both OEMs and EMS companies. The Companys OEM customers often
direct a significant portion of their purchases through EMS companies. While the Companys
customers include both OEM and EMS providers, the Company measures customer concentration based on
OEM companies, as they are the ultimate end customers.
For the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 one customer accounted for approximately
10% and 12% of the Companys net sales, respectively. For the quarter and two quarters ended June
28, 2010, no one customer accounted for 10% or greater of the Companys net sales. The loss of one
or more major customers or a decline in sales to the Companys major customers would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operation.
16
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company also extends credit to its customers, which are concentrated primarily in the
computer and networking and communication and aerospace/defense industries, and most of which are
located outside the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers,
does not require collateral and considers the credit risk profile of the entity from which the
receivable is due in further evaluating collection risk.
As of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys 10 largest customers in the aggregate
accounted for 48% and 53%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. If one or more of the
Companys significant customers were to become insolvent or were otherwise unable to pay for the
manufacturing services provided, it would have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations.
(13) Fair Value Measures
The Company measures at fair value its financial and non-financial assets by using a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, essentially an exit
price, based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability.
At June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the following financial assets and liabilities were
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the type of inputs shown:
June 27, | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |||||||||||||||
2011 | Level 1 Inputs | Level 2 Inputs | Level 3 Inputs | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 97,387 | $ | 97,387 | | | ||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
4,354 | 4,354 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative assets |
1,016 | | $ | 1,016 | | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities |
4,820 | | 4,820 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities |
15 | | 15 | |
December 31, | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |||||||||||||||
2010 | Level 1 Inputs | Level 2 Inputs | Level 3 Inputs | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 66,742 | $ | 66,742 | | | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative assets |
1,219 | | $ | 1,219 | | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities |
4,627 | | 4,627 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities |
277 | | 277 | |
There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 inputs
for the quarter or two quarters ended June 27, 2011.
The following is a summary of activity for fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs for
the two quarters ended June 28, 2010:
For the Two | ||||
Quarters | ||||
Ended | ||||
Fair Value Measurement using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | June 28, 2010 | |||
(In thousands) | ||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 1,351 | ||
Transfers to level 3 |
| |||
Settlement |
(1,351 | ) | ||
Changes in fair value included in earnings |
| |||
Ending balance |
$ | | ||
There was no activity for fair value measurement using Level 3 inputs for the quarter or two
quarters ended June 27, 2011 or the quarter ended June 28, 2010.
17
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
The changes in fair value included in earnings for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 have
been included in other, net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations.
The majority of the Companys non-financial instruments, which include goodwill, intangible
assets, inventories, and property, plant and equipment, are not required to be carried at fair
value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur (or tested at least
annually for goodwill) such that a non-financial instrument is required to be evaluated for
impairment, based upon a comparison of the non-financial instruments fair value to its carrying
value, an impairment is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the fair value, if the carrying
value exceeds the fair value.
For the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and for the two quarters ended June 28,
2010, the following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
using the type of inputs shown:
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Losses for | ||||||||||||||||||||
the Quarter and Two | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 27, | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | Inputs | Inputs | Inputs | June 27, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets |
$ | 19,331 | | $ | 19,331 | | $ | 48,125 | ||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Losses for | ||||||||||||||||||||
the Two Quarters | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 28, | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Ended | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | Inputs | Inputs | Inputs | June 28, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset held for sale |
$ | 234 | | $ | 234 | | $ | 766 | ||||||||||||
The fair values of long-lived assets held and used and the asset held for sale were primarily
determined using appraisals and comparable prices of similar assets, which are considered to be
Level 2 inputs.
(14) Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
The Company is subject to various legal matters, which it considers normal for its business
activities. While the Company currently believes that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for
known matters would not be material to the Companys financial condition, the outcome of these
actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate
potential loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results
of operations in a particular period. The Company has accrued amounts for its loss contingencies
which are probable and estimable at June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010. However, these amounts are
not material to the consolidated condensed financial statements.
Environmental Matters
The process to manufacture PCBs requires adherence to city, county, state, federal and foreign
jurisdiction environmental regulations regarding the storage, use, handling and disposal of
chemicals, solid wastes and other hazardous materials as well as air quality standards. Management
believes that its facilities comply in all material respects with environmental laws and
regulations. The Company has in the past received certain notices of violations and has implemented
certain required minor corrective activities. There can be no assurance that violations will not
occur in the future.
The
Company is involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup of
three sites in Connecticut and one in California related
to environmental remediation matters. The ultimate
cost of site cleanup for the two Connecticut sites and one California site is difficult to predict given the uncertainties regarding the extent of the
required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations, and alternative cleanup
methods. The third Connecticut site was investigated under Connecticuts Land Transfer Act and no
contamination above applicable standards was found. The Company concluded that it was probable that
it would incur remediation and monitoring costs for these sites of
approximately $685 and $558 as
of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, the liability for which is included in other
18
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
long-term liabilities. The Company estimates that it will incur the remediation costs over the next
12 to 84 months. This accrual was
discounted at 8% per annum to determine the Companys best estimate of the liability, which
the Company estimated as ranging from $839 to $1,274 on an undiscounted basis.
The liabilities recorded do not take into account any claims for recoveries from insurance or
third parties and none are anticipated. These costs are mostly comprised of estimated consulting
costs to evaluate potential remediation requirements, completion of the remediation, and monitoring
of results achieved. Subject to the imprecision in estimating future environmental remediation
costs, the Company does not expect the outcome of the environmental remediation matters, either
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
(15) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to calculate basic
earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the quarter and two quarters
ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010:
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
$ | (20,903 | ) | $ | 4,929 | $ | 6,220 | $ | 9,414 | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
81,309 | 76,050 | 81,009 | 59,954 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of performance-based stock units, restricted stock units and stock options |
| 434 | 916 | 550 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of assumed conversion of convertible notes outstanding |
| | 470 | | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares |
81,309 | 76,484 | 82,395 | 60,504 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to TTM |
||||||||||||||||
Technologies, Inc. stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | |||||||
Performance-based stock units, restricted stock units and stock options to purchase 1,714
shares of common stock for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 and 528 and 2,015 shares of common stock
for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively, were not considered in
calculating diluted earnings per share because the options exercise prices or the total expected
proceeds under the treasury stock method for performance-based stock units, restricted stock units
or stock options was greater than the average market price of common shares during the period and,
therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the quarter ended June 27, 2011, potential shares
of common stock, consisting of stock options to purchase approximately 1,167 shares of common stock
at exercise prices ranging from $2.76 to $16.82 per share, 1,338
restricted stock units, and 163
performance-based restricted stock units were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the Company incurred a net loss from operations
and, as a result, the impact would be anti-dilutive.
Additionally, for the quarter ended June 27, 2011, the effect of 10,963 shares of common stock
related to the Companys Convertible Notes, the effect of the convertible note hedge to purchase
10,963 shares of common stock and the warrants sold to purchase 10,963 shares of the Companys
common stock were not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share because the
Company incurred a loss from operations and, as a result, the impact would be anti-dilutive.
19
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
(16) Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the accompanying consolidated condensed
statements of operations as follows:
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 254 | $ | 328 | $ | 471 | $ | 655 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing |
100 | 109 | 211 | 217 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,770 | 1,158 | 3,197 | 2,134 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense recognized |
2,124 | 1,595 | 3,879 | 3,006 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit recognized |
(584 | ) | (412 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (890 | ) | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense after income taxes |
$ | 1,540 | $ | 1,183 | $ | 2,761 | $ | 2,116 | ||||||||
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
In 2010, the Company implemented a long-term incentive program for executives that provides for
the issuance of performance-based restricted stock units (PRUs), representing hypothetical shares
of the Companys common stock that may be issued. Under the PRU program, a target number of PRUs is
awarded at the beginning of each three-year performance period. The number of shares of common
stock released at the end of the performance period will range from zero to 2.4 times the target
number depending on performance during the period. The performance metrics of the PRU program are
based on (a) annual financial targets, which are based on
revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization expense), each
equally weighted, and (b) an overall modifier based on the Companys total stockholder return (TSR)
relative to the S&P SmallCap 600 over the three-year performance period.
The Company records stock-based compensation expense for PRU awards granted based on
managements periodic assessment of the probability of the PRU awards vesting. For the quarter and
two quarters ended June 27, 2011, management determined that vesting of the PRU awards was
probable. PRUs activity for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 was as follows:
Shares | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Outstanding target shares at December 31, 2010 |
55 | |||
Granted: |
||||
Second tranche of 2010 grant |
45 | |||
First tranche of 2011 grant |
63 | |||
Outstanding target shares at June 27, 2011 |
163 | |||
The fair value for PRUs granted is calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model, as the
TSR modifier contains a market condition. For the quarters and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and
June 28, 2010, the following assumptions were used in determining the fair value:
June 27, | June 28, | |||||||
20111 | 20102 | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value |
$ | 22.74 | $ | 10.11 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.0 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
| | ||||||
Expected volatility |
59 | % | 65 | % | ||||
Expected term in months |
28 | 33 |
(1) | Reflects the weighted-averages for the second year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2010 and for the first year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2011. | |
(2) | Reflects the first year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2010. |
20
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted 239 restricted stock units during the quarter ended June 27, 2011 and 574
and 377 restricted stock units during the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010,
respectively. There were no restricted stock units granted for the quarter ended June 28, 2010. The
units granted have a weighted-average fair value per unit of $18.35 for the quarter ended June 27,
2011 and $17.74 and $9.14 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively.
The fair value for restricted stock units granted is based on the closing share price of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant.
Stock Options
The Company did not grant any stock option awards during the quarter or two quarters ended
June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010.
Foreign Employee Share Awards
Prior to the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries by the Company, there existed an employee
share award scheme originally set up by the controlling shareholder of the PCB Subsidiaries to
incentivize and reward the PCB Subsidiaries employees. In 2008, administration of this scheme was
transferred to a small group of employees in order to carry on the objectives of the program. After
the close of the acquisition, the unvested Meadville Holdings shares remaining for vesting and/or
granting purposes under that scheme were exchanged for the right to earn fractional shares of TTM
common stock plus cash equal to the dividend distributed by Meadville Holdings to the holders of
Meadville Holdings shares after the acquisition. These remaining grants vest over five tranches.
Two tranches vested in the first quarter of 2011 and the remaining three tranches will vest
annually thereafter, through 2014. As per ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, the fair value of
the common stock plus cash consideration to be received by the employee, after adjustment for
estimated forfeitures, that is attributed to pre-combination service is recognized as purchase
consideration. The fair value, after adjustment for estimated forfeitures, that is attributed to
post-combination service is recognized as an expense over the remaining vesting period and is
included as a component of total stock-based compensation expense. At June 27, 2011 and December
31, 2010, there were approximately 50 and 193 shares in the employee share award grants,
respectively.
The following is a summary of total unrecognized compensation costs as of June 27, 2011:
Unrecognized | Remaining Weighted | |||||||
Stock-Based | Average Recognition | |||||||
Compensation Cost | Period | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In years) | |||||||
PRU awards |
$ | 2,436 | 2.1 | |||||
RSU awards |
12,620 | 1.6 | ||||||
Stock option awards |
639 | 1.7 | ||||||
Foreign employee share awards |
400 | 1.6 | ||||||
$ | 16,095 | |||||||
(17) Distribution of profits
As stipulated by the relevant laws and regulations of the Peoples Republic of
China (PRC) applicable to the Companys subsidiaries in the PRC, each of such subsidiaries is
required to make appropriations from its net income as determined in accordance with accounting
principles and the relevant financial regulations of the PRC (PRC GAAP) to a non-distributable
reserve, also referred to as statutory surplus reserve. The appropriations to the statutory surplus
reserve are required to be made at not less than 10% of the profit after tax as determined under
PRC GAAP and required until the balance reaches 50% of its registered capital. The statutory
surplus reserve is used to offset future or past losses. The subsidiaries may, upon a resolution passed by
the shareholders, convert the statutory surplus reserve into its capital.
There
were appropriations of approximately $3,295 to the statutory surplus reserve for the
quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011. There were no appropriations to such reserve for the
quarter or two quarters ended June 28, 2010.
21
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
(18) Segment Information
The operating segments reported below are the Companys segments for which separate financial
information is available and upon which operating results are evaluated by the chief operating
decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources. The Company manages its worldwide
operations based on two geographic operating segments: 1) North America, which consists of seven
domestic PCB fabrication plants, including a facility that provides follow-on value-added services
primarily for one of the PCB fabrication plants, and one backplane assembly plant in Shanghai,
China, which is managed in conjunction with the Companys U.S. operations and its related European
sales support infrastructure; and 2) Asia Pacific, which consists of the PCB Subsidiaries and their
seven PCB fabrication plants, which include a substrate facility. Each segment operates
predominantly in the same industry with production facilities that produce similar customized
products for its customers and use similar means of product distribution in their respective
geographic regions.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating segment income, which is
operating income before amortization of intangibles. Interest expense and interest income are not
presented by segment since they are not included in the measure of segment profitability reviewed
by the chief operating decision maker. All inter-segment transactions have been eliminated.
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 142,245 | $ | 138,925 | $ | 284,495 | $ | 277,144 | ||||||||
Asia Pacific |
226,203 | 173,073 | 428,668 | 173,073 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
368,448 | 311,998 | 713,163 | 450,217 | ||||||||||||
Inter-segment sales |
(2,331 | ) | (1,750 | ) | (4,245 | ) | (1,750 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 366,117 | $ | 310,248 | $ | 708,918 | $ | 448,467 | ||||||||
Operating Segment Income (Loss): |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 13,792 | $ | 6,206 | $ | 30,557 | $ | 16,865 | ||||||||
Asia Pacific |
(18,016 | ) | 15,771 | 15,061 | 15,771 | |||||||||||
Total operating segment income (loss) |
(4,224 | ) | 21,977 | 45,618 | 32,636 | |||||||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
(4,321 | ) | (4,621 | ) | (8,479 | ) | (5,412 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating income (loss) |
(8,545 | ) | 17,356 | 37,139 | 27,224 | |||||||||||
Total other expense |
(3,249 | ) | (6,230 | ) | (8,563 | ) | (9,019 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (11,794 | ) | $ | 11,126 | $ | 28,576 | $ | 18,205 | |||||||
During the second quarter ended June 27, 2011, the Company recorded a charge of $48,125 for
its Asia Pacific operating segment for the impairment of long-lived assets. (Note 3)
The Company accounts for inter-segment sales and transfers as if the sale or transfer were to
third parties: at arms length and in conjunction with the Companys revenue recognition policy. The
inter-segment sales for the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 are
sales from the Asia Pacific operating segment to the North America operating segment.
(19) Related Party Transactions
Supply and Lease Arrangements
The Companys foreign subsidiaries enter into long-term supply arrangements to purchase
laminate and prepreg from a related party in which a significant shareholder of the Company holds
an approximate 16% shareholding. These supply arrangements expire on December 31, 2012. The
Companys foreign subsidiaries also purchased laminate and prepreg from the laminate companies of
the said significant shareholder of the Company. The Company purchased laminate and prepreg from
these related parties in the amounts of $32,783 and $26,861 for the quarters ended June 27, 2011
and June 28, 2010, respectively, and $56,916 and $26,861 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011
and June 28, 2010, respectively.
Additionally, a foreign subsidiary of the Company also leases warehouse space from a related
party controlled by a significant shareholder of the Company. Likewise, a related party leases
employee housing space from a foreign subsidiary of the Company. The net income for these
activities was $62 and $80 for the quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively,
and $126 and $80 for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively.
22
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements (Continued)
At June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet
included $47,403 and $50,374, respectively, in accounts payable due to and $153 and $86,
respectively, in accounts receivable due from a related party for the supply and lease
arrangements.
(20) Other
In April 2010, the Company, through its acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, acquired a 10% interest
in a private company, Aspocomp Oulu Oy (Oulu), which is located in Finland. The majority owner of
this private company is Aspocomp Group Oyj (Aspocomp), a Helsinki Stock Exchange traded Finnish
company. The Company accounted for this 10% nonmarketable investment in Oulu using the cost method
of accounting. The fair value assigned to this investment at the acquisition date was $2,718, which
was based on a market approach to estimate the enterprise value.
Aspocomp
was also the 20% minority shareholder in Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings Ltd., a
majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, and therefore was a related party. The Company
consolidated the financial results of this majority-owned company.
Exchange of Investments
On June 8, 2011, the Company exchanged its 10% interest in Oulu for approximately 12,300
shares of Aspocomp, (representing approximately 19.7% of Aspocomps outstanding share capital)
having a fair value of $5,205. The Company has concluded that Aspocomp and Oulu are substantially
similar entities as Aspocomp is a holding company and its primary operating subsidiary is Oulu. As
such, the unrealized gain on the exchange of the investments has been recorded in other comprehensive income,
and no realized gains or losses will be recognized until the Aspocomp shares are sold, unless an
other than temporary decline in fair value occurs in the future. These securities are classified as
available for sale securities, and at June 27, 2011 have a fair value of $4,354. The Company has
determined this investment to be classified as available for sale as it has a
readily determinable fair value and is not being held for trading
purposes. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available for sale securities are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated condensed
balance sheet.
Gain on Early Settlement of Related Party Financing Obligation
The related party financing obligation represents the value of the Companys obligation under
a put and call option agreement which granted Aspocomp the right to
sell its 20% equity interest
in Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings Ltd. to one of the PCB
Subsidiaries. The PCB Subsidiary also had the right to purchase that
20% equity interest held by Aspocomp in Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings Ltd.
On June 8, 2011, the Company settled its obligation under the put and call option agreement
for a payment of approximately $20,528, resulting in a gain of $1,659, which is included in Other,
net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations. As a result of the settlement of this
obligation, Aspocomp is no longer considered to be a related party of the Company.
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with our consolidated condensed financial statements and the related notes and the
other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of specified factors, including those set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors of Part II below
and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading global provider of time-critical and technologically complex printed circuit
board (PCB) products and backplane assemblies (PCBs populated with electronic components), which
serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic products. We provide our customers advanced
technology products and offer a one-stop manufacturing solution to customers from engineering
support to prototype development through final volume production. We serve a diversified customer
base in various markets throughout the world, including manufacturers of networking/communications
infrastructure products, personal computers, touch screen tablets and mobile media devices
(cellular phones and smart phones). We also serve high-end computing, commercial aerospace/defense,
and industrial/medical industries. Our customers include both original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers.
In April 2010, we acquired from Meadville all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
four of its subsidiaries. These four companies and their respective subsidiaries, collectively
referred to as the PCB Subsidiaries, comprised Meadvilles PCB manufacturing and distributing
business. See Note 2 in our consolidated condensed financial statements.
While our customers include both OEM and EMS providers, we measure customers based on OEM
companies as they are the ultimate end customers. We measure customers as those companies that have
placed orders of $2,000 or more in the preceding 12-month period. As of June 27, 2011, we had
approximately 1,260 customers and as of June 28, 2010 we had approximately 1,185 customers. Sales
to our 10 largest customers accounted for 47% and 42% of our net sales in the quarter ended June
27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively. Sales to our 10 largest customers accounted for 47% of
our net sales for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and 42% of our net sales for the two
quarters ended June 28, 2010. We sell to OEMs both directly and indirectly through EMS companies.
The following table shows the percentage of our net sales attributable to each of the
principal end markets we served for the periods indicated.
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, | June 28, | June 27, | June 28, | |||||||||||||
End Markets(1) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Aerospace/Defense |
17 | % | 19 | % | 16 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||
Cellular Phone |
9 | 10 | 9 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Computing/Storage/Peripherals |
23 | 25 | 25 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Medical/Industrial/Instrumentation/Other |
7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Networking/Communications |
38 | 32 | 36 | 33 | ||||||||||||
Other |
6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Sales to EMS companies are classified by the end markets of their OEM customers. |
24
Table of Contents
For PCBs, we measure the time sensitivity of our products by tracking the quick-turn
percentage of our work. We define quick-turn orders as those with delivery times of 10 days or
less, which typically captures research and development, prototype, and new product introduction
work, in addition to unexpected short-term demand among our customers. Generally, we quote prices
after we receive the design specifications and the time and volume requirements from our customers.
Our quick-turn services command a premium price as compared to standard lead-time products.
We also deliver a significant percentage of compressed lead-time work with lead times of 11 to
20 days. We typically receive a premium price for this work as well. Purchase orders may be
cancelled prior to shipment. We charge customers a fee, based on percentage completed, if an order
is cancelled once it has entered production. We derive revenues primarily from the sale of PCBs and
backplane assemblies using customer-supplied engineering and design plans. We recognize revenues
when persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, the sales terms are fixed or determinable,
title and risk of loss have transferred, and collectibility is reasonably assured and in accordance
with sales contracts. Net sales consist of gross sales less an allowance for returns, which
typically has been less than 2% of gross sales. We provide our customers a limited right of return
for defective PCBs and backplane assemblies. We record an estimated amount for sales returns and
allowances at the time of sale based on historical information.
Cost of goods sold consists of materials, labor, outside services, and overhead expenses
incurred in the manufacture and testing of our products as well as stock-based compensation
expense. Many factors affect our gross margin, including capacity utilization, product mix,
production volume, and yield. We generally do not participate in any significant long-term
contracts with suppliers, with the exception of the supply arrangement to purchase laminate and
prepregs from a related party controlled by a significant shareholder, and we believe there are a
number of potential suppliers for the raw materials we use.
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our
internal sales force and independent sales representatives, salaries paid to our sales support
staff, stock-based compensation expense as well as costs associated with marketing materials and
trade shows. We generally pay higher commissions to our independent sales representatives for
quick-turn work, which generally has a higher gross profit component than standard lead-time work.
General and administrative costs primarily include the salaries for executive, finance,
accounting, information technology, facilities and human resources personnel, as well as insurance
expenses, expenses for accounting and legal assistance, incentive compensation expense, stock-based
compensation expense, bad debt expense, gains or losses on the sale or disposal of property, plant
and equipment, and acquisition related expenses.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of
our consolidated condensed financial statements and requires management to make judgments that
could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. These policies
require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate.
Different estimates we could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimates that are reasonably
likely to occur, could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these
estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
25
Table of Contents
Our critical accounting policies include asset valuation related to bad debts and inventory;
sales returns and allowances; impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible
assets; derivative instruments and hedging activities; realizability of deferred tax assets;
establishing the fair value of individual assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling
interest when we acquire other businesses; and determining self-insured reserves.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We provide customary credit terms to our customers and generally do not require collateral. We
perform ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of our customers and maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical collections experience and judgments as to
expected collectibility of accounts. Our actual bad debts may differ from our estimates.
Inventories
In assessing the realizability of inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future
demand requirements and compare these with current and committed inventory levels. When the market
value of inventory is less than the carrying value, the inventory cost is written down to the
estimated net realizable value thereby establishing a new cost basis. Our inventory requirements
may change based on our projected customer demand, market conditions, technological and product
life cycle changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors that could
affect the valuation of our inventories. We maintain certain finished goods inventories near
certain key customer locations in accordance with agreements with those customers. Although this
inventory is typically supported by valid purchase orders, should these customers ultimately not
purchase these inventories, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
Sales Returns and Allowances
We derive revenues primarily from the sale of printed circuit boards and backplane assemblies
using customer-supplied engineering and design plans and generally recognize revenue upon delivery.
We provide our customers a limited right of return for defective printed circuit boards and
backplane assemblies. We accrue an estimated amount for sales returns and allowances at the time of
sale using our judgment based on historical information and anticipated returns as a result of
current period sales. To the extent actual experience varies from our historical experience,
revisions to these allowances may be required.
Long-lived Assets
We have significant long-lived tangible and intangible assets consisting of property, plant
and equipment, definite-lived intangibles, and goodwill. We review these assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may
not be recoverable. In addition, we perform an impairment test related to goodwill at least
annually. Our goodwill and intangibles are largely attributable to our acquisitions of other
businesses. We have two operating segments, North America and Asia Pacific.
During the fourth quarter of each year, and when events and circumstances warrant an
evaluation, we perform an impairment assessment of goodwill, which requires the use of a fair value
based analysis. We determine the fair value of our reporting units based on discounted cash flows
and market approach analyses as considered necessary and consider factors such as a weakened
economy, reduced expectations for future cash flows coupled with a decline in the market price of
our stock and market capitalization for a sustained period as indicators for potential goodwill
impairment. If the reporting units carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step
must be performed to measure the amount of the goodwill impairment loss, if any. The second step
compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill, determined in the same manner as
the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, with the carrying amount of such
goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
26
Table of Contents
We also assess other long-lived assets, specifically property, plant and equipment, for
potential impairment given similar impairment indicators. When indicators of impairment exist
related to our long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets, we use an estimate
of the undiscounted net cash flows in measuring whether the carrying amount of the assets is
recoverable. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based upon the difference between
the assets carrying value and estimated fair value. Fair value is determined through various
valuation techniques, including market and income approaches as considered necessary. During the
quarter ended June 27, 2011, we completed our assessment of long-lived assets and determined that
the carrying value of certain long-lived assets at production facilities within our Asia Pacific
operating segment exceeded their fair value. As a result, we recorded
an impairment of long-lived assets for $48.1 million to adjust such assets to their fair value as of June 27, 2011.
We use an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows in measuring whether our
long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are recoverable. If forecasts and
assumptions used to support the realizability of our goodwill and other long-lived assets change in
the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As a matter of policy, we use derivatives for risk management purposes, and we do not use
derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives are typically entered into as hedges of changes
in interest rates, currency exchange rates, and other risks.
When we determine to designate a derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge, we formally
document the hedging relationship and its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking
the hedge, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the
hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed, and a
description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. We also formally assess, both at the
hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative that is used in hedging
transactions is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the
consolidated condensed balance sheet with measurement at fair value. Fair value of the derivative
instruments is determined using pricing models developed based on the underlying swap interest
rate, foreign currency exchange rates, and other observable market data as appropriate. The values
are also adjusted to reflect nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company. For
derivatives that are designated as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, to the extent the derivative is effective
at offsetting the changes in cash flow being hedged until the hedged item affects earnings. To the
extent there is any hedge ineffectiveness, changes in fair value relating to the ineffective
portion are immediately recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
not designated as hedges are recorded in earnings each period.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets are reviewed for recoverability, and valuation allowances are
provided, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts that are more likely
than not to be realized based on our estimate of future taxable income. Should our expectations of
taxable income change in future periods, it may be necessary to establish a valuation allowance,
which could affect our results of operations in the period such a determination is made. We record
an income tax provision or benefit during interim periods at a rate that is based on expected
results for the full year. If future changes in market conditions cause actual results for the year
to be more or less favorable than those expected, adjustments to the effective income tax rate
could be required.
In addition, we are subject to income taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the
ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions where the ultimate tax determination
is uncertain. Additionally, our calculations of income taxes are based on our interpretations of
applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file.
27
Table of Contents
Business Combinations
We allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest, based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over these fair values is recorded as goodwill. We engage
independent third-party appraisal firms to assist us in determining the fair values of assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interest. Such valuations require management to
make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
For the business combination with Meadville in April 2010, the fair value of the real property was estimated primarily via the cost approach, and where
applicable, the sales comparison approach and income approach. The procedures employed include
site inspections, analysis of the subject properties, review of the highest and best use of the
subject properties, discussions with onsite property management, determinations regarding future
use of the facilities, review of real property market data available in the local market,
estimation of replacement cost, new and typical expected useful lives, and the calculation of all
factors of obsolescence.
For the fair value of the personal property we utilize the cost approach as the primary
approach for valuing the majority of the personal property. The market approach was used to
estimate the value of certain equipment commonly traded in the second hand marketplace, as well as
computers and computer-related assets. The income approach was used to quantify any economic
obsolescence that may be present in the subject assets. Our analysis also entailed an estimation of
useful lives, which were researched and discussed with property management and market sources. The
fair value measurement assumes the highest and best use of personal property assets by market
participants.
The significant purchased intangible assets recorded by us include customer relationships,
trade name, and order backlog. The fair values assigned to the identified intangible assets are
discussed in Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.
Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to: future
expected cash flows from customer relationships, estimating cash flows from existing backlog,
market position of the trade name, as well as assumptions about cash flow savings from the trade
name, and discount rates. Managements estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed
to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual
results may differ from estimates.
Estimates associated with the accounting for acquisitions may change during the measurement
period as additional information becomes available regarding the assets acquired, liabilities
assumed, and noncontrolling interest as discussed in Note 2 of the notes to consolidated condensed
financial statements.
Self Insurance
We are primarily self-insured in North America for group health insurance and workers
compensation benefits provided to our U.S. employees, and we purchase insurance to protect against
annual claims at the individual and aggregate level. We estimate our exposure for claims incurred
but not reported at the end of each reporting period. We use our judgment using our historical
claim data and information and analysis provided by actuarial and claim advisors, our insurance
carriers and brokers on an annual basis to estimate our liability for these claims. This liability
is subject to individual insured stop-loss coverage for both programs, which is $250,000 per
individual. Our actual claims experience may differ from our estimates.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
There were 91 days in each of the second quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010 and
178 and 179 days in the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively. Included
in the consolidated condensed statement of operations for both the quarter and two quarters ended
June 28, 2010 are 81 days of Asia Pacifics results of operations for the period from April 9, 2010
through June 28, 2010. The acquisition has had and will continue to have a significant effect on
our operations as discussed in the various comparisons noted below.
28
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the relationship of various items to net sales in our
consolidated condensed statement of operations:
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
78.9 | 81.6 | 77.5 | 81.3 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
21.1 | 18.4 | 22.5 | 18.7 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
2.5 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6.6 | 8.2 | 6.7 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
1.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 0.1 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
13.1 | 0.1 | 6.8 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
23.4 | 12.8 | 17.3 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2.3 | ) | 5.6 | 5.2 | 6.1 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1.8 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
0.9 | | 0.6 | | ||||||||||||
Total other expense, net |
(0.9 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(3.2 | ) | 3.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision |
(2.3 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(5.5 | ) | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(0.2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc.
stockholders |
(5.7 | )% | 1.6 | % | 0.9 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
We manage our worldwide operations based on two geographic operating segments: (1) North
America, which consists of seven domestic PCB fabrication plants, including a facility that
provides follow-on value-added services primarily for one of the PCB fabrication plants, and one
backplane assembly plant in Shanghai, China, which is managed in conjunction with our U.S.
operations and its related European sales support infrastructure; and (2) Asia Pacific, which
consists of the PCB Subsidiaries and their seven PCB fabrication plants, which include a substrate
facility. Each segment operates predominantly in the same industry with production facilities that
produce similar customized products for our customers and use similar means of product distribution
in their respective geographic regions.
The following table compares net sales by reportable segment for the quarters and two quarters
ended June 27, 2011 and June 28, 2010:
Quarter Ended | Two Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | June 27, 2011 | June 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 142,245 | $ | 138,925 | $ | 284,495 | $ | 277,144 | ||||||||
Asia Pacific |
226,203 | 173,073 | 428,668 | 173,073 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
368,448 | 311,998 | 713,163 | 450,217 | ||||||||||||
Inter-segment sales |
(2,331 | ) | (1,750 | ) | (4,245 | ) | (1,750 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 366,117 | $ | 310,248 | $ | 708,918 | $ | 448,467 | ||||||||
Net Sales
Total net sales increased $55.9 million or 18.0%, from $310.2 million for the quarter ended June 28,
2010 to $366.1 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. Sales related to the North America
segment increased $3.3 million, or 2.4%, from $138.9 million for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to
$142.2 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011 and was primarily due to higher average PCB
pricing and increased demand at our backplane assembly facilities. Sales related to the Asia
Pacific segment increased $53.1 million, or 30.7%, from $173.1 million for the quarter ended June
28, 2010 to $226.2 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011 and was primarily due to higher
average prices, product mix shift, increased production as well as the inclusion of 81 days of results of operations for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 compared to 91 days for the quarter ended June 27, 2011.
29
Table of Contents
Total net sales increased by $260.4 million from $448.5 million for the two quarters ended
June 28, 2010 to $708.9 million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. Sales related to the
North America segment increased by $7.4 million, or 2.7%, from $277.1 million for the two quarters
ended June 28, 2010 to $284.5 million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and was primarily
due to higher average PCB pricing and increased demand at our backplane assembly facilities,
partially offset by the closure of our Hayward, California backplane assembly facility. Sales for
the Asia Pacific segment increased by $255.6 million from $173.1 million for the two quarters June
28, 2010 to $428.7 million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and was mainly due to the
inclusion of only 81 days of results of operations for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010
compared to 178 days for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011.
Cost of Goods Sold
Total cost of goods sold increased $35.6 million from $253.2 million for the quarter ended
June 28, 2010 to $288.8 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. Cost of goods sold related to
the North America segment increased $2.8 million in line with the sales increase from $111.2
million for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to
$114.0 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011.
As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold for the North America segment remained consistent
at 80.0% for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 and 80.1% for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. Cost
of goods sold related to the Asia Pacific segment increased $32.9 million, or 23.2%, from $141.9
million in the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to $174.8 million in the quarter ended June 27, 2011. As
a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold for the Asia Pacific segment decreased from 82.9% for
the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to 78.3% for the quarter ended June 27, 2011 and was primarily due
to the inclusion of a $6.7 million fair value mark up on the substantially completed acquired PCB
inventory in the quarter ended June 28, 2010.
Total cost of goods sold increased by $185.3 million from $364.4 million for the two quarters
ended June 28, 2010 to $549.7 million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. Cost of goods sold
related to the North America segment increased $2.6 million from $222.5 million for the two
quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $225.1 million for the two
quarters ended June 27, 2011. As a
percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold for the North America segment decreased from 80.3% for
the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to 79.1% for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and was
primarily due to higher average sales prices and savings from the closure of our Hayward,
California production facility in 2010. Cost of goods sold related to the Asia Pacific segment
increased $182.6 million from $141.9 million for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $324.5
million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold
related to the Asia Pacific segment decreased from 82.9% for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010
to 76.7% for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011 and was due to the inclusion of a $6.7 million
fair value mark up on the substantially completed acquired PCB inventory in the quarter ended June
28, 2010 combined with higher average sales prices in our Asia Pacific segment during the two
quarters ended June 27, 2011, which contained 178 days of results of operations compared to only 81 days
of results of operations for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010.
Gross Profit
As a result of the foregoing, gross profit increased by $20.2 million from $57.1 million for
the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to $77.3 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. The overall
gross margin percentage increased from 18.4% for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to 21.1% for the
quarter ended June 27, 2011 and was primarily due to the inclusion of a $6.7 million fair value
mark up on the substantially completed acquired PCB inventory in the quarter ended June 28, 2010 as
described above.
As a result of the foregoing, gross profit increased by $75.2 million from $84.1 million for
the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $159.3 million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011.
The overall gross margin increased from 18.7% for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to 22.5% for
the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to the
inclusion of a $6.7 million fair value mark up on the substantially completed acquired PCB
inventory in the quarter ended June 28, 2010, in addition to higher overall profit margins for the
Asia Pacific segment. Additionally, gross margins increased in our North America segment due to the
facility closure discussed above.
30
Table of Contents
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses increased by $0.2 million, or 2.2%, from $9.1 million for the
quarter ended June 28, 2010 to $9.3 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. As a percentage of
net sales, selling and marketing expenses were 2.9% for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 as compared
to 2.5% for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. Additionally, selling and marketing expenses increased
by $2.6 million, or 16.5%, from $15.8 million for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $18.4
million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. As a percentage of net sales, selling and
marketing expenses were 3.5% for the two quarters ended June 28,
2010 as compared to 2.6% for the
two quarters ended June 27, 2011. The decline in selling and marketing expense for the quarter and
two quarters ended June 27, 2011 as a percentage of net sales is due to our acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries, which have lower selling labor and commission expense than our North America segment.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.2 million from $25.3 million, or 8.2% of net
sales, for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to $24.1 million, or 6.6% of net sales, for the quarter
ended June 27, 2011. Additionally, general and administrative expenses increased $12.8 million from
$34.4 million, or 7.7% of net sales, for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $47.2 million, or
6.7% of net sales, for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. The changes in expense for the quarter
and two quarters ended June 28, 2010 and June 27, 2011 primarily relates to our acquisition of the
PCB Subsidiaries in April 2010, partially offset by a decrease in transaction-related costs of $7.0
million and $8.8 million from the quarter and two quarters ended June 28, 2010, respectively.
Amortization of Definite-Lived Intangibles
Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships, trade name and order backlog.
Intangible amortization expense decreased for the quarter ended June 27, 2011 by $0.3 million
from $4.6 million, or 1.5% of net sales, for the quarter ended June 28, 2010 to $4.3 million, or
1.2% of net sales, for the quarter ended June 27, 2011. The decrease in amortization expense for
the quarter ended June 27, 2011 as compared to the quarter ended June 28, 2010 is primarily due to
completion of the valuation of intangible assets in conjunction with finalizing the allocation
of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests for the acquisition
of the PCB Subsidiaries. Additionally, intangible amortization expense increased by $3.1 million
from $5.4 million, or 1.2% of net sales, for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $8.5 million,
or 1.2% of net sales, for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. The overall increase of
amortization expense between the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 and two quarters ended June 27,
2011 was due to our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
During the quarter
ended June 27, 2011, we recorded an impairment charge in the
amount of $48.1 million to reduce the carrying value of certain
long-lived assets in the Asia Pacific operating segment. The impairment charge is comprised of $39,850 related to manufacturing equipment held for use at a plant acquired by Meadville in
2007 for which we had previously reduced the carrying value of certain of these assets during our purchase price allocation completed
in 2010 related to the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. Weaker than expected operating performance at this manufacturing plant in
the first six months of 2011 resulting from a downturn in the profitability of the products produced at this manufacturing plant and a
reduction in expected future demand for the specific products produced resulted in a triggering event during the quarter ended June 27,
2011. Based on the undiscounted cash flows for this plant, an impairment of the manufacturing assets was indicated. Our asset
grouping for the impairment test was the manufacturing plant as the manufacturing equipment at this plant is specific to the products
produced with separately identifiable cash flows. In addition, the manufacturing equipment at this plant cannot be used at our other
manufacturing sites. The fair value of these manufacturing assets was determined using a discounted cash flow model over their
remaining useful life with the impairment being the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the asset group. The
impairment charge also includes $8,275 related to manufacturing
equipment that, due to the change in market conditions noted
above, has become or is expected to become technologically obsolete. Accordingly, during the quarter ended June 27, 2011, we revised our
classification of these assets to held for sale or disposal. The fair value of these assets was determined using third party quotes or
other estimates of salvage value and the assets carrying value was
written down to salvage value. The new carrying value of the
assets
held for sale or disposal is approximately $1,003, which is included in machinery and equipment in property, plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet.
If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our long-lived assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense, net decreased $3.0 million from $6.2 million for the quarter ended June 28,
2010 to $3.2 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011.
Additionally, other expense, net
decreased by $0.4 million from $9.0 million for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $8.6
million for the two quarters ended June 27, 2011. The decrease in other expense, net for the
quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011 was primarily due to a realized gain of $1.7 million
related to the early settlement of a related party financing obligation, related to the remaining
20% interest in Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings Ltd., and foreign currency transaction gains,
partially offset by interest expense related to the debt assumed at the date of acquisition of the
PCB Subsidiaries.
31
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased $4.1 million from $4.4 million for the quarter ended
June 28, 2010 to $8.5 million for the quarter ended June 27, 2011 and by $12.8 million from $7.0
million for the two quarters ended June 28, 2010 to $19.8 million for the two quarters ended June
27, 2011 primarily due to higher pre-tax income and certain foreign losses generated for which a tax
benefit was not recorded. Our effective tax rate was 71.9% and 39.4% for the quarter ended June
27, 2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively, and 69.1% and 38.3% for the two quarters ended June 27,
2011 and June 28, 2010, respectively. Our effective tax rate changed in 2011 primarily due to the
impact of an impairment for which a tax benefit was not recorded,
partially offset by an increase in total
earnings generated in lower-tax jurisdictions resulting from the acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries, which have a lower effective tax rate than our North America operations. Our
effective tax rate is primarily impacted by the U.S. federal income tax rate, apportioned state
income tax rates, tax rates in China and Hong Kong, generation of other credits and deductions
available to us, and certain non-deductible items. Certain foreign losses generated are not more
than likely to be realizable, and thus no income tax benefit has been recognized on these losses.
Additionally, as of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had net deferred income tax assets of
approximately $10.5 million and $18.3 million, respectively. Based on our forecast for future
taxable earnings, we believe it is more likely than not that we will utilize the deferred income
tax assets in future periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations, the issuance of
Convertible Notes and, more recently, the issuance of term and revolving debt. Our principal uses
of cash have been to meet debt service requirements, finance capital expenditures, fund working
capital requirements and finance acquisitions. We anticipate that servicing debt, funding working
capital requirements, financing capital expenditures, and acquisitions will continue to be the
principal demands on our cash in the future.
As of June 27, 2011, we had net working capital of approximately $228.7 million compared to
$258.3 million as of December 31, 2010.
Our 2011 capital expenditure plan is expected to total approximately $136.0 million (of which
approximately $115.0 million relates to our Asia Pacific segment), and will fund capital equipment
purchases to increase production capacity, expand our technological capabilities and replace aging
equipment.
Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash generated from operations, cash
on hand and available borrowings under our existing credit arrangements will be adequate to meet
our currently anticipated debt service, capital expenditures, acquisition, and working capital
needs for the next 12 months and beyond. The semiannual repayments on our existing term loan
increase as the debt nears maturity in 2013. Should we choose to maintain a significant level of
annual capital expenditures or to pursue an acquisition in the next few years, refinancing of our
existing debt may be necessary. In the event we determine to engage in significant acquisition or
debt refinancing transactions, the adequacy of our liquidity will depend on our ability to achieve
an appropriate combination of financing from third parties and access to capital markets. We cannot
give any assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing or otherwise access the
capital markets in the future on acceptable terms or at all.
Credit Agreement
On April 9, 2010, in conjunction with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, the Company
became a party to a credit agreement (Credit Agreement), entered into on November 16, 2009 by
certain PCB Subsidiaries, which are now our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement
was put in place in contemplation of the acquisition in order to refinance the then-existing credit
facilities of the PCB Subsidiaries.
The Credit Agreement consists of a $350.0 million senior secured Term Loan, an $87.5 million
senior secured Revolving Loan, a $65.0 million Factoring Facility, and a $80.0 million Letters of
Credit Facility, all of which mature on November 16, 2013. The Credit Agreement is secured by
substantially all of the assets of the PCB Subsidiaries. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the
full and punctual payment of all obligations of the PCB Subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement.
32
Table of Contents
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (term election
by Company) plus an applicable interest margin. Borrowings bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus
2.0% under the Term Loan, LIBOR plus 2.25% under the Revolving Loan, and LIBOR plus 1.25% under the
Factoring Facility. At June 27, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding
borrowings was 2.20%.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are subject to certain financial and operating covenants
that include maintaining maximum total leverage ratios and minimum net worth, current assets, and
interest coverage ratios at both the Company and PCB Subsidiaries level. At June 27, 2011, we were
in compliance with the covenants.
We are required to pay a commitment fee of 0.20% per annum on any unused portion of loan or
facility under the Credit Agreement. We incurred $0.1 million and $0.2 million in commitment fees
for the quarter and two quarters ended June 27, 2011, respectively, related to the unused portion
of any loan or facility under the Credit Agreement. As of June 27, 2011, all of the remaining Term
Loan, $20.0 million of the Revolving Loan, and
$65.1 million of the Letters of Credit
Facility was outstanding, and available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Loan and Factoring Facility
was $67.5 million and $65.0 million, respectively.
Bank Loans
Bank loans are made up of bank lines of credit in mainland China and are used for working
capital and capital investment for our mainland China facilities. These facilities are denominated
in either U.S. Dollars or Chinese Renminbi (RMB), with interest rates tied to either LIBOR or the
Peoples Bank of China rates with a small margin adjustment. These bank loans expire on various
dates through June 2013.
Convertible Notes
In 2008 we issued $175.0 million of Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes bear interest at
a rate of 3.25% per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of
each year. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally to our future
unsecured senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our future subordinated
indebtedness.
At any time prior to November 15, 2014, holders may convert their Convertible Notes into cash
and, if applicable, into shares of our common stock based on a conversion rate of 62.6449 shares of
our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment, under the
following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter beginning after June 30, 2008 (and only
during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20
trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable
conversion price on each applicable trading day of such preceding calendar quarter; (2) during the
five business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per
note for each day of that 10 consecutive trading day period is less than 98% of the product of the
last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on such day; or (3) upon the
occurrence of specified corporate transactions described in the prospectus supplement related to
the Convertible Notes, which can be found on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. As of June 27, 2011,
none of the conversion criteria had been met.
On or after November 15, 2014 until the close of business on the third scheduled trading day
preceding the May 15, 2015 maturity of the Convertible Notes, holders may convert their notes at
any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, for each $1,000 principal
amount of notes, we will pay cash for the lesser of the conversion value or $1,000 and shares of
our common stock, if any, based on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for
each day of the applicable 60 trading day observation period.
The maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion, subject to certain conversion rate
adjustments, would be approximately 14 million shares.
We are not permitted to redeem the notes at any time prior to maturity. In the event of a
fundamental change or certain default events, as defined in the prospectus supplement, holders may
require us to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the
principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
33
Table of Contents
In 2008, in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into a
convertible note hedge and warrant transaction (Call Spread Transaction), with respect to our
common stock. The convertible note hedge consists of our option to purchase up to 11.0 million
shares of common stock at a price of $15.96 per share. This option expires on May 15, 2015 and can
only be executed upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. Additionally, we sold warrants for
the option to purchase 11.0 million shares of our common stock at a price of $18.15 per share. The
warrants expire ratably beginning August 2015 through February 2016. The Call Spread Transaction
has no effect on the terms of the Convertible Notes and reduces potential dilution by effectively
increasing the conversion price of the Convertible Notes to $18.15 per share of our common stock.
Other Letters of Credit
In addition to the letters of credit obtained by the PCB Subsidiaries pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, we maintain several letters of credit: a $2.0 million standby letter of credit expiring
December 31, 2011 associated with insured workers compensation program; a $1.0 million standby
letter of credit expiring February 29, 2012 related to the lease for one of our production
facilities; and various other letters of credits aggregating to approximately $1.7 million related
to purchases of machinery and equipment with various expiration dates through July 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table provides information on our contractual obligations as of June 27, 2011:
Less Than | After | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations(1)(2) | Total | 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 4 - 5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
$ | 379,205 | $ | 123,369 | $ | 255,830 | $ | 6 | $ | | ||||||||||
Convertible debt obligations |
175,000 | | | 175,000 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest on debt obligations |
35,515 | 13,003 | 16,824 | 5,688 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap liabilities |
5,565 | 3,686 | 1,879 | | | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contract liabilities |
15 | 15 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Equipment payables |
74,579 | 69,019 | 5,560 | | | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
76,374 | 38,786 | 37,588 | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
4,759 | 2,102 | 1,320 | 453 | 884 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 751,012 | $ | 249,980 | $ | 319,001 | $ | 181,147 | $ | 884 | ||||||||||
(1) | Unrecognized uncertain tax benefits of $0.1 million are not included in the table above as we have not determined when the amount will be paid. | |
(2) | Estimated environmental liabilities of $0.7 million, not included in the table above, are accrued and recorded as liabilities in our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of June 27, 2011. |
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have, nor have we ever had, any relationships with unconsolidated entities
or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage
in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As a result, we are not materially
exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in
these relationships.
Seasonality
As a result of the product and customer mix of our Asia Pacific operating segment, a portion
of our revenue will be subject to seasonal fluctuations going forward. These fluctuations include
seasonal patterns in the computer and cellular phone industry, which together have become a
significant portion of the end markets that we serve. This seasonality typically results in higher
net sales in the third quarter due to end customer demand for fourth quarter sales of consumer
electronics products. Seasonal fluctuations also include the Chinese New Year holiday in the first
quarter, which typically results in lower net sales.
34
Table of Contents
Impact of Inflation
We believe that our results of operations are not materially impacted by moderate changes in
the inflation rate as we expect that we generally will be able to continue to pass along component
price increases to our customers. Severe increases in inflation, however, could affect the global
and U.S. economies and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2011, we adopted a new accounting standard related to revenue recognition in
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This standard eliminates the residual method of revenue
allocation by requiring entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling
prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. Our adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to an accounting standard related to comprehensive
income, whereby an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income,
and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Our adoption of this updated
standard is not expected to have a material impact.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of business operations we are exposed to risks associated with
fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We address these risks through
controlled risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments to
economically hedge or reduce these exposures. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments
for trading or speculative purposes.
We have not experienced any losses to date on any derivative financial instruments due to
counterparty credit risk.
To ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of our interest rate and foreign exchange hedge
positions, we continually monitor our interest rate swap positions and foreign exchange forward
positions, both on a stand-alone basis and in conjunction with their underlying interest rate and
foreign currency exposures, from an accounting and economic perspective. However, given the
inherent limitations of forecasting and the anticipatory nature of the exposures intended to be
hedged, we cannot assure that such programs will offset more than a portion of the adverse
financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in either interest or foreign exchange rates.
In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to
mark-to-market instruments for any given period may not coincide with the timing of gains and
losses related to the underlying economic exposures and, therefore, may adversely affect our
consolidated condensed operating results and financial position.
Interest rate risk
Our business is exposed to interest rate risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates.
Our interest expense is more sensitive to fluctuations in the general level of LIBOR and the
Peoples Bank of China interest rates than to changes in rates in other markets. Increases in
interest rates would increase interest expenses relating to the outstanding variable rate
borrowings of certain foreign subsidiaries and increase the cost of debt. Fluctuations in interest
rates can also lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of the debt obligations.
On April 9, 2010, we entered into a two-year pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month LIBOR),
amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial notional amount of $146.5 million, for
the period beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013. The interest rate swap will apply
a fixed interest rate against the first interest payments of a portion of the $350.0 million Term
Loan for this period. The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases to zero over its
term, consistent with our risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at
June 27, 2011 was $146.5 million. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will pay a
fixed rate of 2.50% and will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period.
35
Table of Contents
To the extent the instruments are considered to be effective, changes in fair value are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. To the extent there is any hedge
ineffectiveness, changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are immediately
recognized in earnings as interest expense. No ineffectiveness was recognized for the quarter or
two quarters ended June 27, 2011. At inception, the fair value of the interest rate swap was zero.
As of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded as a liability
of $4.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change in the
fair value of the interest rate swap is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax, in our consolidated condensed balance sheet. During the quarter and two
quarters ended June 27, 2011, the interest rate swap increased interest expense by $0.7 million. We
have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
We also, through our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, assumed a long term pay-fixed,
receive floating (1-month LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial
notional amount of $40.0 million, for the period beginning October 8, 2008 and ending on July 30,
2012. The notional amount of the interest rate swap amortizes to zero over its term, consistent
with our risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at June 27, 2011 was
$34.0 million. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, we will pay a fixed rate of 3.43% and
will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. As the borrowings attributable to this
interest rate swap were paid off upon acquisition, we did not designate this interest rate swap as
a cash flow hedge. As of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was
recorded as a liability of $0.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in other long-term
liabilities. The change in fair value of this interest rate swap is recorded as other, net in the
consolidated condensed statement of operations.
As of June 27, 2011, approximately 64% of our total debt was based on fixed rates, including
notional amounts related to interest rate swaps. Based on our borrowings as of June 27, 2011 an
assumed 1% change in variable rates would cause our annual interest cost to change by $2.0 million.
Foreign currency risks
We are subject to risks associated with transactions that are denominated in currencies other
than our functional currencies, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in a
foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar as a normal part of the reporting process. Our Asia Pacific
operations utilize the Chinese Renminbi, or RMB, and the Hong Kong Dollar, or HKD, as the
functional currency, which results in the Company recording a translation adjustment that is
included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not generally
engage in hedging to manage foreign currency risk related to its revenue and expenses denominated
in RMB and HKD.
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and to reduce the volatility of purchases and other obligations generated
in currencies other than the functional currencies. Our foreign subsidiaries may at times purchase
forward exchange contracts to manage their foreign currency risk in relation to particular
purchases or obligations, such as the related party financing obligation arising from the put call
option to purchase the remaining 20% of a majority owned subsidiary, which was settled in early
June 2011 when the put call option was settled in cash, and certain purchases of machinery
denominated in foreign currencies other than our foreign functional currency. The notional amount
of the foreign exchange contracts at June 27, 2011 was approximately $40.5 million. We have
designated certain of these foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, with the exception of
the foreign exchange contracts in relation to the related party
financing obligation, which was
settled in June 2011. In this instance, the hedged item was a recognized liability subject to
foreign currency transaction gains and losses and therefore, changes in the hedged item due to
foreign currency exchange rates were already recorded in earnings.
Therefore, hedge accounting was
not applied.
36
Table of Contents
The table below presents information about certain of the foreign currency forward contracts
at June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
As of June 27, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Average Contract | Average Contract | |||||||||||||||
Notional | Rate or Strike | Notional Rate or | Strike | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | Amount | |||||||||||||
(In thousands in | (In thousands in | |||||||||||||||
USD) | USD) | |||||||||||||||
Receive foreign currency/pay USD |
||||||||||||||||
Euro |
$ | 37,415 | 1.37 | $ | 31,685 | 1.32 | ||||||||||
Japanese Yen |
3,113 | 0.01 | 4,581 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
$ | 40,528 | $ | 36,266 | |||||||||||||
Estimated fair value, net asset |
$ | 1,001 | $ | 942 | ||||||||||||
Debt Instruments
The table below presents information about certain of our debt instruments (bank borrowings)
as of June 27, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
As of June 27, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Market | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Value | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
$ | 55,000 | $ | 117,000 | $ | 192,500 | $ | | $ | | $ | 364,500 | $ | 363,106 | 2.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
RMB |
| 3,865 | 10,822 | | | 14,687 | 14,687 | 5.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Variable Rate |
55,000 | 120,865 | 203,322 | | | 379,187 | 377,793 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US |
$ | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,018 | 214,183 | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Rate |
2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,018 | 214,183 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 55,002 | $ | 120,869 | $ | 203,326 | $ | 4 | $ | 175,004 | $ | 554,205 | $ | 591,976 | ||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Market | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Value | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
$ | 56,500 | $ | 117,000 | $ | 192,500 | $ | | $ | | $ | 366,000 | $ | 356,380 | 2.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
RMB |
10,619 | 3,792 | | | | 14,411 | 14,411 | 5.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Variable Rate |
67,119 | 120,792 | 192,500 | | | 380,411 | 370,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US |
$ | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,021 | 207,529 | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Rate |
4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,021 | 207,529 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 67,123 | $ | 120,797 | $ | 192,504 | $ | 4 | $ | 175,004 | $ | 555,432 | $ | 578,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The table below presents information regarding our interest rate swaps as of June 27, 2011.
Remaining | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Fair Market Value | |||||||||||||
Average interest payout rate |
2.59 | % | 2.59 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||||||
Interest payout amount |
(2,162 | ) | (3,155 | ) | (676 | ) | ||||||||||
Average interest received rate |
0.19 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
Interest received amount |
151 | 227 | 50 | |||||||||||||
Fair value loss at June 27, 2011 |
(4,820 | ) |
37
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures for financial reporting to give
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. These controls and procedures also give
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and
communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), together with management,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June
27, 2011, pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and
CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the
Exchange Act) were effective such that information relating to the Company, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports, (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time frames specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is
accumulated and communicated to company management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to
allow timely discussion regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 27, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and chief financial officer, does
not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls also can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of our business. There can be no assurance that we will prevail in any such litigation. We
believe that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for known matters would not be material to
our financial condition; however, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict.
In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the factors described in Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, in analyzing an investment in our common stock. If any of the
risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K occurs, our business, financial condition, and results of
operations would likely suffer, the trading price of our common stock could fall, and you could
lose all or part of the money you paid for our common stock.
38
Table of Contents
In addition, the risk factors and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements, whether made in this report or
the other documents we file with the SEC, or our annual or quarterly reports to stockholders,
future press releases, or orally, whether in presentations, responses to questions, or otherwise.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibits | |
3.1
|
Registrants Certificate of Incorporation, as amended June 3, 2011(1) | |
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS* |
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not
subject to liability under those sections.
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011.
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TTM Technologies, Inc. |
||||
/s/ Kenton K. Alder | ||||
Kenton K. Alder | ||||
Dated: August 8, 2011 | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ Steven W. Richards | ||||
Steven W. Richards | ||||
Dated: August 8, 2011 | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
40
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibits | |
3.1
|
Registrants Certificate of Incorporation, as amended June 3, 2011(1) | |
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS* |
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not
subject to liability under those sections.
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011.
41