Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration File No. 333-107811

11,000,000 Shares
Common Stock

TTM Technologies, Inc. is selling 200,000 shares of common stock, and the selling shareholders identified in this prospectus are selling an additional 10,800,000 shares. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares sold by selling shareholders. Some of the selling shareholders have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,650,000 shares to cover over-allotments, if any.

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "TTMI." The last reported sale price on September 17, 2003 was $12.48 per share.

INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 5.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Thomas Weisel Partners LLC is acting as book-running lead manager for the offering. Thomas Weisel Partners LLC expects to deliver the shares to purchasers on or about September 23, 2003.

                   Needham & Company, Inc.

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC              

The date of this prospectus is September 17, 2003.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

        You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell shares of common stock and seeking offers to buy shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock.

        In this prospectus "company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to TTM Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option.

        This prospectus contains our trademarks and trade names and those of other companies.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

        You should read the following summary together with the more detailed information concerning our company, the common stock being sold in this offering and our financial statements appearing in this prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Because this is only a summary, you should read the rest of this prospectus, including the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus, before you invest in our common stock. Read this entire prospectus carefully, especially the risks described under "Risk Factors."

Our Company

        We are a one-stop provider of time-critical and technologically complex printed circuit boards, which serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic products. We serve high-end commercial markets—including networking/communications infrastructure, high-end computing and industrial/medical—which are characterized by high levels of complexity, short life cycles and moderate production volumes. Our customers include original equipment manufacturers and electronic manufacturing services companies. We significantly enhanced our capability to manufacture technologically complex printed circuit boards through our December 2002 acquisition of Honeywell Advanced Circuits, Inc.

The TTM Solution

        We manufacture printed circuit boards that satisfy all stages of an electronic product's life cycle—from prototype to volume production—for targeted commercial end markets. Key aspects of our solution include:

•

One-stop manufacturing solution.  We offer a one-stop manufacturing solution to our customers through our specialized facilities, each of which generally focuses on a different stage of an electronic product's life cycle. This one-stop solution allows us to provide a broad array of services and technologies to meet the rapidly evolving needs of our customer base.



•

Quick-turn services.  We deliver highly complex printed circuit boards to customers in as little as 24 hours. This rapid delivery service enables original equipment manufacturers to develop sophisticated electronic products quickly and reduce time to market. In addition, our quick-turn services provide us with an opportunity to capture additional business, including high-mix and volume production in our targeted end markets.



•

Strong process and technology expertise.  We deliver time-critical and highly complex manufacturing services through our advanced manufacturing processes and technology expertise. We regularly manufacture printed circuit boards with up to 32 layers. For the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, approximately 62% of our gross sales involved the manufacture of printed circuit boards with at least 12 layers, an industry-accepted measure of complexity.

Our Manufacturing Services

Quick-turn services

        We refer to our rapid turnaround services as "quick-turn" because we provide custom-designed printed circuit boards to our customers within as little as 24 hours to 10 days from time of order. As a result of our ability to rapidly and reliably respond to the critical time requirements of our customers, we generally receive a premium for our quick-turn services.

•

Prototype production.  In the design, testing and launch phase of a new electronic product's life cycle, our customers typically require limited quantities of printed circuit boards in a very

1

short period of time. We satisfy this need by manufacturing prototype printed circuit boards in small quantities of up to 50 boards per order with delivery times ranging from as little as 24 hours to 10 days.

•

Ramp-to-volume production.  After a product has successfully completed the prototype phase, our customers introduce the product to the market and require larger quantities of printed circuit boards in a short period of time. This transition stage between low-volume prototype production and volume production is known as ramp-to-volume. Our ramp-to-volume services typically include manufacturing up to several hundred printed circuit boards per order with delivery times ranging from two to 10 days.

        For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, orders with delivery requirements of 10 days or less represented 40% and 45% of our gross sales, respectively. Quick-turn orders decreased to approximately 28% of our gross sales for the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003. This change in order mix resulted from our acquisition of Advanced Circuits, which focuses primarily on manufacturing technologically complex printed circuit boards with standard delivery times.

Standard delivery time services

        Our standard delivery time services focus on the high-mix and complex technology requirements of our customers, with delivery times typically ranging from three to five weeks. High-mix manufacturing involves processing small lots, generally up to several hundred printed circuit boards, in a flexible manufacturing environment. Our high technology expertise is evidenced by our ability to regularly produce complex printed circuit boards with up to 32 layers in volumes that satisfy our customers' entire production needs. In addition, many of our lower layer-count circuit boards are complex as a result of the incorporation of other technologically advanced features, including high performance materials and extremely fine geometries and tolerances. Our acquisition of Advanced Circuits significantly increased our ability to produce technologically complex printed circuit boards for high-end commercial applications. As a result, our average layer count increased from 8.5 in the first two fiscal quarters of 2002 to 13.9 in the first two fiscal quarters of 2003. We do not target our standard delivery time services to high-volume, consumer electronic applications such as cellular telephones, personal computers, hand-held devices and automotive products.

Our Facilities and Customers

        We utilize a facility specialization strategy in which each order is directed to the facility best suited to the customer's particular delivery time, product complexity and volume needs. Our three facilities use compatible technologies and manufacturing processes, allowing us to move orders easily between plants to optimize operating efficiency. This strategy provides customers with faster delivery times and enhanced product quality and consistency. Our Santa Ana, California facility focuses on prototype production and new customer development. Our Redmond, Washington facility primarily handles ramp-to-volume and high-mix production, with some capacity for prototype production. Our Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin facility, part of our recent Advanced Circuits acquisition, focuses on the very high technology segment of the printed circuit board industry with standard delivery times.

        Our significant original equipment manufacturer customers include Adtran, Agilent Technologies, Apple Computer, Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, ITT, Juniper Networks, Micron Technology, Motorola and Sun Microsystems. Our significant electronic manufacturing services customers include Benchmark Electronics, Celestica, Jabil Circuit, MC Assembly, Plexus, Solectron and Vanguard EMS. We sell to original equipment manufacturers both directly and through electronic manufacturing services companies. As of June 30, 2003, we had approximately 590 customers, compared to approximately 565 customers at December 31, 2002.

2

Our Strategy

        Our goal is to be the leading provider of time-critical, one-stop manufacturing services for highly complex printed circuit boards. Key aspects of our strategy include:

•

leveraging our one-stop manufacturing solution to capture additional business from customers throughout different stages of the product life cycle—from prototype to volume production;



•

using our quick-turn capabilities to attract new customers with high-growth potential;



•

continuing to improve our technological capabilities and manufacturing processes to further reduce delivery times, improve quality, increase yields and decrease costs;



•

capitalizing on facility specialization to enhance operating efficiency; and



•

expanding our presence in targeted niche markets through internal initiatives and selective acquisitions.

Our Address

        We were incorporated in Washington in March 1978 as Pacific Circuits, Inc. and changed our name to TTM Technologies, Inc. in December 1999. Our principal executive offices are located at 2630 South Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92704, and our telephone number at that address is (714) 327-3000.

The Offering

        The above information is based on 39,869,294 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2003, includes 25,900 shares to be issued upon exercise of options by a selling shareholder in connection with this offering, and excludes:

•

2,864,853 other shares issuable upon exercise of options outstanding under our management stock option plan at a weighted average exercise price of $5.50 per share; and



•

approximately 4,598,239 shares available for future issuance under our two stock plans.

3

Summary Consolidated Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)

        The following table presents a summary of our historical consolidated financial data for the periods presented. You should read this data along with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

(1)

Reflects our December 2002 acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

(2)

Adjusted to reflect the sale of 200,000 shares of common stock offered by us at the public offering price of $12.00 per share, the sale of 25,900 shares issuable upon the exercise of options by a selling shareholder in connection with this offering at an exercise price of $2.63 per share, the deduction of the underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses and the application of the net proceeds as set forth in "Use of Proceeds."

4

RISK FACTORS

        You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes.

Risks Related to Our Company

We are heavily dependent upon the worldwide electronics industry, which suffered a significant downturn in demand in 2001 and 2002, resulting in excess manufacturing capacity, increased price competition and slower moving inventories. This global slowdown decreased demand for our manufacturing services and lowered our sales and gross margins.

        A majority of our revenues are generated from the electronics industry, which is characterized by intense competition, relatively short product life cycles and significant fluctuations in product demand. Furthermore, the industry is subject to economic cycles and recessionary periods and has been negatively impacted by a contraction in the U.S. economy and worldwide electronics market. Moreover, due to the uncertainty in the end markets served by most of our customers, we have a low level of visibility with respect to future financial results. A lasting economic recession, continued excess manufacturing capacity or an additional decline in the electronics industry could further negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our net sales declined from $129.0 million in 2001 to $89.0 million in 2002. While we have recently experienced sequential quarterly increases in our net sales, this trend may not continue. A future decline in our net sales could harm our profitability and results of operations and could require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets or recognize an impairment of our long-lived assets including goodwill and other intangible assets.

If excess global manufacturing capacity continues to exist, our gross margins may fall and/or we may have to incur restructuring charges if we choose to close any of our facilities.

        Due to continuing fluctuations in demand, our facilities have been operating significantly below capacity. When we experience excess capacity, our sales revenues may not fully cover our fixed overhead expenses, and our gross margins will fall. In addition, we generally schedule our quick-turn production facilities at less than full capacity to retain our ability to respond to unexpected additional quick-turn orders. However, if these orders are not received, we may forego some production and could experience continued excess capacity.

        If we believe we have significant long-term excess capacity, we may decide to permanently close one or more of our facilities and lay off some of our employees. This could result in our recording restructuring charges such as we did in the second and fourth fiscal quarters 2002 due to the restructuring and subsequent closure of our Burlington, Washington facility and in the first fiscal quarter 2003 due to the lay off of employees at our Redmond, Washington facility.

We are dependent upon a small number of customers for a large portion of our net sales, and a decline in sales to major customers could harm our results of operations.

        A small number of customers are responsible for a significant portion of our net sales. Our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 41.8% of our net sales in 2002 and 65.2% of our net sales in the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003. Our 2003 increase in customer concentration was due primarily to our acquisition of Advanced Circuits, which has a small number of large

5

customers. If our customers fail to place orders with us at past levels, it would harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. We expect a significant portion of our net sales will continue to be generated by a small number of customers.

        Our customer concentration could fluctuate depending on future customer requirements, which will depend in large part on market conditions in the electronics industry segments in which our customers participate. The loss of one or more major customers or a decline in sales to our major customers could significantly harm our business, results of operations and financial condition and lead to declines in the trading price of our common stock. In addition, we generate significant accounts receivable in connection with providing manufacturing services to our customers. If one or more of our significant customers were to become insolvent or were otherwise unable to pay for the manufacturing services provided by us, our results of operations would be harmed.

We compete against manufacturers in Asia, where production costs are lower. These competitors may gain market share in our key market segments, which may have an adverse effect on the pricing of our products.

        We may be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to price when compared to manufacturers with lower cost facilities in Asia and other locations. We believe price competition from printed circuit board manufacturers in Asia and other locations with lower production costs may play an increasing role in the market. We do not have offshore facilities in lower cost locations such as Asia. While historically our competitors in these locations have produced less technologically advanced printed circuit boards, they continue to expand their capacity with advanced equipment to produce higher technology printed circuit boards. In addition, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may benefit these offshore competitors. As a result, these competitors may gain market share, which may force us to lower our prices, reducing our gross margins.

We are exposed to the credit risk of some of our customers and to credit exposures in weakened markets.

        Most of our sales are on an "open credit" basis, with standard industry payment terms. We monitor individual customer payment capability in granting such open credit arrangements, seek to limit such open credit to amounts we believe the customers can pay, and maintain reserves we believe are adequate to cover exposure for doubtful accounts. Some of our customers are electronic manufacturing services companies located abroad, and our exposure to these foreign customers increased as a result of our December 2002 acquisition of Advanced Circuits. Our foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, and are typically on the same "open credit" basis and terms described above. Our foreign receivables are expected to grow as a percentage of our total receivables. We do not utilize credit insurance as a risk management tool, but we periodically evaluate our risk management options.

        Because of the slowdown in the global economy in 2001 and 2002, our exposure to the credit risks relating to our financing activities described above increased. Although we have programs in place to monitor and mitigate the associated risks, such programs may not be effective in reducing our credit risks. There have been bankruptcies among customers causing us to incur economic or financial losses. Should economic conditions not improve, we may incur additional losses. Although our losses have not been material to date, future losses, if incurred, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

6

We have expanded our operations through acquisitions, and we may have trouble integrating acquisitions. Acquisitions involve numerous risks.

        As part of our business strategy, we expect that we will continue to grow by pursuing acquisitions, assets or product lines that complement or expand our existing business. We currently have no commitments or agreements to acquire any business. Our existing credit facility restricts our ability to acquire the assets or business of other companies and will accordingly require us to obtain the consent of our lenders and could require us to pay significant fees, become subject to reduced liquidity, or become subject to additional or more restrictive covenants in order to consummate such acquisitions. Consequently, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or finance and complete transactions that we choose to pursue.

        Our acquisition of companies and businesses and expansion of operations involve risks, including the following:

•

the potential inability to identify assets best suited to our company's business plan;



•

the potential inability to successfully integrate acquired operations and businesses or to realize anticipated synergies, economies of scale or other expected value;



•

diversion of management's attention from normal daily operations of the business;



•

difficulties in managing production and coordinating operations at new sites;



•

the potential inability to retain existing customers of acquired companies when we desire to do so;



•

insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions;



•

the potential need to restructure, modify or terminate customer relationships of the acquired company;



•

an increased concentration of business from existing or new customers; and



•

the potential loss of key employees of acquired operations.

        Acquisitions may cause us to:

•

issue common stock that would dilute our current shareholders' percentage ownership;



•

assume liabilities;



•

record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential periodic impairment charges;



•

enter markets in which we have limited or no prior experience;



•

incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets;



•

incur large and immediate write-offs;



•

incur unanticipated costs; or



•

become subject to litigation and environmental issues.

        Acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky, and no assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not harm our business, operating results or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions we make could harm our business and operating results in a material way. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, product enhancements may not be made in a timely

7

fashion. In addition, unforeseen issues might arise with respect to such products after the acquisition.

If we are unable to respond to rapid technological change and process development, we may not be able to compete effectively.

        The market for our manufacturing services is characterized by rapidly changing technology and continual implementation of new production processes. The future success of our business will depend in large part upon our ability to maintain and enhance our technological capabilities, to manufacture products that meet changing customer needs, and to successfully anticipate or respond to technological changes on a cost-effective and timely basis. We expect that the investment necessary to maintain our technological position will increase as customers make demands for products and services requiring more advanced technology on a quicker turnaround basis. We may not be able to raise additional funds in order to respond to technological changes as quickly as our competitors.

        In addition, the printed circuit board industry could encounter competition from new or revised manufacturing and production technologies that render existing manufacturing and production technology less competitive or obsolete. We may not respond effectively to the technological requirements of the changing market. If we need new technologies and equipment to remain competitive, the development, acquisition and implementation of those technologies and equipment may require us to make significant capital investments.

Competition in the printed circuit board market is intense, and we could lose market share if we are unable to maintain our current competitive position in end markets using our quick-turn, high technology and high-mix manufacturing services.

        The printed circuit board industry is intensely competitive, highly fragmented and rapidly changing. We expect competition to continue, which could result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Our principal domestic competitors include DDi, Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Merix, Sanmina-SCI and Tyco. In addition, we increasingly compete on an international basis and new and emerging technologies may result in new competitors entering our markets.

        Many of our competitors and potential competitors have a number of significant advantages over us, including:

•

greater financial and manufacturing resources that can be devoted to the development, production and sale of their products;



•

more established and broader sales and marketing channels;



•

more manufacturing facilities worldwide, some of which are closer in proximity to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs;



•

manufacturing facilities which are located in countries with lower production costs;



•

preferred vendor status with existing and potential customers;



•

greater name recognition; and



•

larger customer bases.

        In addition, these competitors may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, or adapt more quickly to changes in customer requirements and devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we do. We must continually develop improved manufacturing processes to meet our customers' needs for complex products, and our

8

manufacturing process technology is generally not subject to significant proprietary protection. During recessionary periods in the electronics industry, our strategy of providing quick-turn services, an integrated manufacturing solution and responsive customer service may take on reduced importance to our customers. As a result, we may need to compete more on the basis of price, which could cause our margins to decline. Furthermore, printed circuit board manufacturers are currently experiencing overcapacity. Overcapacity, combined with weakness in demand for electronic products, results in increased competition and price erosion for printed circuit boards.

Our quarterly results of operations are often subject to demand fluctuations and seasonality. With a high level of fixed operating costs, even small revenue shortfalls would decrease our gross margins and potentially cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

        Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate for a variety of reasons, including:

•

timing of orders from and shipments to major customers;



•

the levels at which we utilize our manufacturing capacity;



•

price competition;



•

changes in our mix of revenues generated from quick-turn versus standard delivery time services;



•

expenditures or write-offs, including those related to acquisitions or facility restructurings; and



•

expenses relating to expanding existing manufacturing facilities.

        A significant portion of our operating expenses is relatively fixed in nature, and planned expenditures are based in part on anticipated orders. Accordingly, unexpected revenue shortfalls may decrease our gross margins. In addition, we have experienced sales fluctuations due to seasonal patterns in the capital budgeting and purchasing cycles as well as inventory management practices of our customers and the end markets we serve. In particular, the seasonality of the computer industry and quick turn ordering patterns impact the overall printed circuit board industry. These seasonal trends have caused fluctuations in our quarterly operating results in the past and may continue to do so in the future. Results of operations in any quarterly period should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. In addition, our future quarterly operating results may fluctuate and may not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline.

Because we sell on a purchase order basis, we are subject to uncertainties and variability in demand by our customers, which could decrease revenues and harm our operating results.

        We sell to customers on a purchase order basis rather than pursuant to long-term contracts. Our quick-turn orders are subject to particularly short lead times. Consequently, our net sales are subject to short-term variability in demand by our customers. Customers submitting a purchase order may cancel, reduce or delay their order for a variety of reasons. The level and timing of orders placed by our customers vary due to:

•

customer attempts to manage inventory;



•

changes in customers' manufacturing strategies, such as a decision by a customer to either diversify or consolidate the number of printed circuit board manufacturers used or to manufacture its own products internally;



•

variation in demand for our customers' products; and



•

changes in new product introductions.

9

        We have experienced terminations, reductions and delays in our customers' orders. Further terminations, reductions or delays in our customers' orders could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The increasing prominence of electronic manufacturing services providers in the printed circuit board industry could reduce our gross margins, potential sales and customers.

        In 2002, approximately 28% of our net sales were to electronic manufacturing services providers. For the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, approximately 62% of our net sales were to electronic manufacturing services providers. Electronic manufacturing services companies source on a global basis to a greater extent than OEMs. The growth of electronic manufacturing services providers increases the purchasing power of such providers and could result in increased price competition, or the loss of existing OEM customers. In addition, some electronic manufacturing services providers, including several of our customers, have the ability to directly manufacture printed circuit boards. If a significant number of our other electronic manufacturing services customers were to acquire the ability to directly manufacture printed circuit boards, our customer base may shrink, and our business and net sales may decline substantially. Moreover, if any of our OEM customers outsource the production of printed circuit boards to these electronic manufacturing services providers, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be harmed.

If we were to increase our amortization of definite-lived intangible assets as a result of additional acquisitions, our earnings could be negatively impacted. Similarly, if we were to revalue our existing intangible assets downward, our operating results would be harmed.

        As of June 30, 2003, our consolidated balance sheet reflected $76.8 million of intangible assets, a substantial portion of our total assets at such date. Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill and other identifiable intangibles relating to our July 1999 acquisition of Power Circuits. Our intangible assets may increase in future periods if we consummate other acquisitions. Amortization or impairment of these additional intangibles would, in turn, harm our earnings. In addition, we evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of intangible assets may not be recoverable. When factors indicate that assets should be evaluated for possible impairment, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of our intangible assets, which could harm our results during the periods in which such a reduction is recognized.

If our net earnings do not recover or we are not able to predict with a reasonable degree of probability that they will continue, we may have to record a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.

        As of June 30, 2003, we had net deferred tax assets of approximately $16.5 million. If we should determine that it is more likely than not that we will not generate taxable income in sufficient amounts to be able to use our net deferred tax assets, we would be required to increase our current valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. This would result in an additional income tax provision and a deterioration of our results of operations.

We rely on suppliers for the timely delivery of raw materials used in manufacturing our printed circuit boards, and an increase in industry demand or the presence of a shortage for these raw materials may increase the price of these raw materials and reduce our gross margins. If a raw material supplier fails to satisfy our product quality standards, it could harm our customer relationships.

        To manufacture our printed circuit boards, we use raw materials such as laminated layers of fiberglass, copper foil and chemical solutions, which we order from our suppliers. Although we have preferred suppliers for most of our raw materials, the materials we use are generally readily

10

available in the open market, and numerous other potential suppliers exist. However, from time to time manufacturers of products that also use these raw materials increase their demand for these materials and, as a result, the prices of these materials increase. During these periods of increased demand, our gross margins may decrease as we have to pay more for our raw materials. If a raw material supplier fails to satisfy our product quality standards, it could harm our customer relationships. Suppliers may from time to time extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors, which could harm our ability to deliver our products on a timely basis.

Damage to our manufacturing facilities could increase our costs of doing business and adversely affect our ability to deliver our manufacturing services on a timely basis.

        We have three manufacturing facilities, which are located in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin; Redmond, Washington; and Santa Ana, California. The destruction or closure of any of our manufacturing facilities for a significant period of time as a result of fire, explosion, blizzard, act of war or terrorism, flood, tornado, earthquake, lightning or other natural disaster could increase our costs of doing business and harm our ability to deliver our manufacturing services on a timely basis and, consequently, our operating results.

Our manufacturing processes depend on the collective industry experience of our employees. If these employees were to leave us, our manufacturing processes may suffer and we may not be able to compete effectively.

        We have limited patent or trade secret protection for our manufacturing process. We rely on the collective experience of our employees in the manufacturing process to ensure we continuously evaluate and adopt new technologies in our industry. Although we are not dependent on any one employee or a small number of employees, if a significant number of our employees involved in our manufacturing process were to leave our employment and we were not able to replace these people with new employees with comparable experience, our manufacturing processes may suffer as we may be unable to keep up with innovations in the industry. As a result, we may lose our ability to continue to compete effectively.

We may be exposed to intellectual property infringement claims by third parties which could be costly to defend, could divert management's attention and resources and, if successful, could result in liability.

        We could be subject to legal proceedings and claims for alleged infringement by us of third party proprietary rights, such as patents, from time to time in the ordinary course of business. For example, in the past we were informed that our prior use of a chemical solution in our manufacturing process may have infringed upon the intellectual property rights of the holder of the patent of the chemical solution. Although no legal action has been taken against us, any claims relating to this alleged infringement, even if not meritorious, could result in costly litigation and divert management's attention and resources. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in disputing this assertion, we could be required to pay royalties or damages for our past use of the chemical solution. Similarly, we were advised that we have been added as a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona by Lemelson Medical, Education and Research Foundation, Limited Partnership. The suit alleges that we have infringed certain "machine vision" and other patents owned by the plaintiff and seeks injunctive relief, damages for the alleged infringements and payment of the plaintiff's attorneys' fees. Finally, it is possible that the circuit board designs and other specifications supplied to us by our customers might infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties, in which case our manufacture of printed circuit boards according to such designs and specifications could expose us to legal proceedings for allegedly aiding and abetting the violation, as well as to potential liability

11

for the infringement. If we do not prevail in any litigation as a result of any of the above or related allegations, our business may be harmed.

Our business may suffer if any of our key senior executives discontinues employment with us or if we are unable to recruit and retain highly skilled engineering and sales staff.

        Our future success depends to a large extent on the services of our key managerial employees, particularly Kenton Alder, our chief executive officer. We may not be able to retain our executive officers and key personnel or attract additional qualified management in the future. Our business also depends on our continuing ability to recruit, train and retain highly qualified employees, particularly engineering and sales and marketing personnel. The competition for these employees is intense, and the loss of these employees could harm our business. Further, our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies depends in part on our ability to retain key management and existing employees at the time of the acquisition.

Products we manufacture may contain design or manufacturing defects, which could result in reduced demand for our services and liability claims against us.

        We manufacture products to our customers' specifications, which are highly complex and may contain design or manufacturing errors or failures despite our quality control and quality assurance efforts. Defects in the products we manufacture, whether caused by a design, manufacturing or materials failure or error, may result in delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction, or a reduction or cancellation of purchase orders. If these defects occur either in large quantities or too frequently, our business reputation may be impaired. In connection with our acquisition of Advanced Circuits in December 2002, our sales mix shifted towards standard delivery time products, which have larger production runs and thereby increase our exposure to these types of defects. Since our products are used in products that are integral to our customers' businesses, errors, defects or other performance problems could result in financial or other damages to our customers beyond the cost of the printed circuit board, for which we may be liable. Although our invoices and sales arrangements generally contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability and related claims, existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial decisions could negate these limitation of liability provisions. Product liability litigation against us, even if it were unsuccessful, would be time consuming and costly to defend.

Our failure to comply with the requirements of environmental laws could result in fines and revocation of permits necessary to our manufacturing processes.

        Our operations are regulated under a number of federal, state and foreign environmental and safety laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water, as well as the handling, storage and disposal of such materials. These laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as well as analogous state and foreign laws. Compliance with these environmental laws is a major consideration for us because our manufacturing processes use and generate materials classified as hazardous such as ammoniacal etching solutions, copper and nickel. Because we use hazardous materials and generate hazardous wastes in our manufacturing processes, we may be subject to potential financial liability for costs associated with the investigation and remediation of our own sites, or sites at which we have arranged for the disposal of hazardous wastes, if such sites become contaminated. Even if we fully comply with applicable environmental laws and are not directly at fault for the contamination, we may still be liable. The wastes we generate include spent ammoniacal etching solutions, metal stripping solutions and hydrochloric acid solution containing palladium; waste water which contains heavy metals, acids, cleaners and conditioners; and filter cake from equipment used for on-site waste treatment. We believe that our operations substantially

12

comply with all applicable environmental laws. However, any material violations of environmental laws by us could subject us to revocation of our effluent discharge permits. Any such revocations could require us to cease or limit production at one or more of our facilities, and harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even if we ultimately prevail, environmental lawsuits against us would be time consuming and costly to defend.

        Environmental laws could also become more stringent over time, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with violation. We operate in environmentally sensitive locations and we are subject to potentially conflicting and changing regulatory agendas of political, business and environmental groups. Changes or restrictions on discharge limits, emissions levels, material storage, handling or disposal might require a high level of unplanned capital investment and/or relocation. It is possible that environmental compliance costs and penalties from new or existing regulations may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health, and the restrictions imposed by the terms of our credit agreement may severely limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our business.

        At June 30, 2003, we had $10.0 million of indebtedness. In addition, subject to the restrictions under our credit agreement, we may incur revolving loan indebtedness from time to time to finance acquisitions or capital expenditures or for other purposes.

        Our level of debt could have negative consequences. For example, it could:

•

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to repayment of debt, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes;



•

increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic conditions by making it more difficult to borrow additional funds to maintain our operations if we suffer revenue shortfalls;



•

hinder our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry by preventing us from borrowing money to upgrade our equipment or facilities; and



•

limit or impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes.

Risks Related to Arthur Andersen LLP

We have been unable to obtain any required consents from our former independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP. It is unlikely you would be able to recover damages from them.

        In June 2002, Arthur Andersen was convicted of federal obstruction of justice charges in connection with its destruction of documents related to Enron Corp. and subsequently ceased conducting business. In order to include audited financial statements in a registration statement, we are required to obtain a consent from the independent public accountants who reported on the financial statements. Arthur Andersen cannot provide consents to include financial statements reported on by them in our registration statement. The report covering the financial statements for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 was previously issued by Arthur Andersen and has not been reissued by them. Because we are unable to obtain a consent from Arthur Andersen, you will be unable to sue Arthur Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for material misstatements or omissions, if any, in the registration statement and prospectus, including the financial statements covered by their previously issued reports. Since Arthur Andersen has ceased conducting business, it is unlikely you would be able to recover damages from Arthur Andersen for any claim against them.

13

Risks Related to this Offering

Our major shareholder has significant influence over our business and could delay, deter or prevent a change of control or other business combination.

        As of June 30, 2003, Circuit Holdings held approximately 39.3% of our outstanding stock. Thayer Capital Partners controls three entities that together own approximately 60.0% of Circuit Holdings and beneficially own approximately 45.8% of our shares. In addition, two of our directors are representatives of Thayer Capital Partners. Although Thayer Capital Partners does not currently own any interests in our direct competitors, the interests of Thayer Capital Partners may not always coincide with our interests or those of our other shareholders. By virtue of its stock ownership and board representation, Thayer Capital Partners will continue to have a significant influence over all matters submitted to our board and our shareholders, including the election of our directors, and will be able to exercise significant control over our business, policies and affairs. Through its voting power, Thayer Capital Partners could cause us to take actions that we would not consider absent its influence, or could delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our company or other business combination that might otherwise be beneficial to our public shareholders.

        Thayer Capital Partners has historically worked closely with Brockway Moran & Partners, Inc. Brockway Moran & Partners Fund, L.P. owns the remaining 40.0% of Circuit Holdings. In addition, one of our directors is a representative of Brockway Moran & Partners. Although there is no legal agreement requiring Thayer Capital Partners and Brockway Moran & Partners to vote their shares together or for their representatives on our board to vote together, given their relationship in the past these two entities may continue to work together, in which case they would exert substantial influence over our board and exercise voting control over approximately 21.0% of our outstanding shares after this offering, or approximately 17.0% if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full.

The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue in the future.

        The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly from $23.88 per share on October 22, 2000 to $1.20 per share on October 10, 2002 to $12.73 per share on September 16, 2003. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate further as a result of a number of factors. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include:

•

actual and anticipated variations in our operating results;



•

general economic and market conditions;



•

interest rates;



•

geo-political conditions throughout the world;



•

general conditions, including changes in demand in the printed circuit board industry and the end markets which it serves;



•

perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the printed circuit board industry and the end markets which it serves;



•

our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt when due;



•

developments in our relationships with our lenders, customers, and/or suppliers;



•

announcements of alliances, mergers or other relationships by or between our competitors and/or our suppliers and customers;



•

announcements of plant closings, layoffs, restructurings or bankruptcies by our competitors; and

14

•

developments related to regulations, including environmental and wastewater regulations.

        We expect this volatility to continue in the future. In addition, any shortfall or changes in our revenue, gross margins, earnings or other financial results could also cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. In recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the printed circuit board industry and that may be unrelated to the operating performance of the companies within these industries. These broad market fluctuations may harm the trading price of our common stock.

Shares eligible for public sale after this offering could harm the trading price of our common stock.

        The trading price for our common stock could decline as a result of sales by our existing shareholders of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market after this offering or the perception that such sales may occur. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. Of the approximately 40.1 million shares that will be outstanding following the completion of this offering:

•

approximately 31.6 million shares generally will be freely tradable in the public market, including all of the 11.0 million shares offered under this prospectus;



•

approximately 8.5 million additional shares may be sold after the expiration of the 90-day lock-up agreements entered into by our officers, directors and the selling shareholders in this offering, subject to compliance with the volume limitations and other restrictions of Rule 144; and



•

approximately 2.9 million additional shares will be eligible for issuance pursuant to options presently outstanding under our existing stock option plans, which shares we anticipate will be freely tradable once issued.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        All statements, trend analyses and other information contained in this prospectus, including those regarding markets for our manufacturing services and trends in or expectations for net sales, gross profit or expense levels, and any statement that contains the words "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "seek" and other similar expressions, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The matters described in these forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks, including those risks identified in "Risk Factors" and in the cautionary statements elsewhere in this prospectus and our actual results of operations may differ significantly from those contained in the forward-looking statements because of such risks. Accordingly, the cautionary statements made in this prospectus apply to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. In addition, these forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, and we do not undertake to update or revise these forward-looking statements, even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed or implied in this prospectus or other statements by us will not be realized.

        Market data and forecasts used in this prospectus including, for example, estimates of the size and growth rates of the printed circuit board market, have been obtained from independent industry sources, and we have not verified the data.

15

USE OF PROCEEDS

        We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from the sale of 200,000 shares of our common stock in this offering of approximately $1.8 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will also receive approximately $68,000 upon the exercise of options to purchase an aggregate of 25,900 shares by a selling shareholder who will sell these shares in this offering. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock being offered by the selling shareholders.

        We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The principal purpose of this offering is to provide increased liquidity for our common stock.

DIVIDEND POLICY

        We have not paid any dividends since 1998 and we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Additionally, our credit facility prohibits the payment of dividends. We presently intend to retain any future earnings to finance future operations and expansion of our business, and to reduce indebtedness.

16

CAPITALIZATION

        The following table sets forth our capitalization as of June 30, 2003:

•

on an actual basis; and



•

as adjusted to reflect (1) the sale of the 200,000 shares of common stock offered by us, at the public offering price of $12.00 per share, the deduction of the underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses and the application of the net proceeds we will receive from the offering in the manner described in "Use of Proceeds;" and (2) the sale of 25,900 shares issuable upon the exercise of options by a selling shareholder who will sell these shares in this offering.

(1)

Excludes the following shares:

•

2,864,853 other shares issuable upon exercise of options outstanding under our management stock option plan at a weighted average exercise price of $5.50 per share; and

•

approximately 4,598,239 shares available for future issuance under our two stock plans.

17

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except per share data)

        You should read the selected consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus, including the documents incorporated herein by reference. All share amounts and per share data have been adjusted to reflect the 380-for-one split of our common stock effected in September 2000.

(1)

Reflects our December 2002 acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

18

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" section of this prospectus, and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, including the documents incorporated herein by reference.

Overview

        We are a one-stop provider of time-critical and technologically complex, multilayer printed circuit boards, which serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic products. We serve high-end commercial markets—including networking/communications infrastructure, high-end computing and industrial/medical—which are characterized by high levels of complexity, short life cycles and moderate production volumes. Our customers include OEMs and electronic manufacturing services companies. Our time-to-market and high technology focused manufacturing services enable our customers to reduce the time required to develop new products and bring them to market.

        We manufacture printed circuit boards to our customers' design specifications and price them to reflect both the complexity of the printed circuit boards and the time and volume requirements for the order. Generally, we quote prices after we receive the design specifications and time and volume requirements from our customers. Purchase orders may be cancelled prior to shipment. We charge customers a fee, based on percentage completed, if an order is cancelled once it has entered production.

        We recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has transferred, and collectibility is reasonably assured—generally when products are shipped to the customer. Net sales consist of gross sales less an allowance for returns. We provide our customers a limited right of return for defective printed circuit boards. We record an allowance for estimated sales returns at the time of sale based on our historical results.

        Cost of goods sold consists of materials, labor, outside services, freight and overhead expenses incurred in the manufacturing and testing of products. Many factors affect our gross margin, including capacity utilization, product sales mix, production volume and yield. We do not have significant long-term supply contracts, and we believe there are a number of potential suppliers for the raw materials we use. We believe that our cost of goods sold will continue to fluctuate as a percentage of net sales.

        Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our internal sales force and commissions paid to independent sales representatives, as well as costs associated with marketing materials and trade shows. Our average commission rate is generally higher on quick-turn than on standard delivery time services. We expect our selling and marketing expenses to continue to fluctuate as a percentage of net sales.

        General and administrative costs primarily include the salaries for executive, finance, accounting, facilities, information technology and human resources personnel, as well as insurance expenses and expenses for accounting and legal assistance. We expect these expenses to continue to fluctuate as a percentage of net sales.

        Amortization of intangibles consists of intangible assets, which we recorded as a result of the Power Circuits acquisition in July 1999. Effective January 1, 2002, we no longer record amortization on goodwill (see "Recently Issued Accounting Standards"). However, we continue to amortize our definite-lived intangible assets, which are primarily comprised of strategic customer relationships. Goodwill amortization was $3.6 million in both 2000 and 2001. See transition disclosures in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus.

19

        Restructuring charges relate primarily to the costs of closing our Burlington, Washington facility and reducing the number of employees at our Redmond, Washington facility. The charges include primarily the costs of laying off employees, non-cash impairment charges related to the Burlington building, property and equipment and other exit charges.

        Amortization of the deferred retention bonus relates to a retention bonus plan we implemented as part of our leveraged recapitalization in December 1998. In 2000, we paid $10.8 million to participants in order to eliminate our obligations under this plan.

        Our interest expense relates to our senior credit facility and our other long-term obligations.

        Amortization of debt issuance costs consists of the amortization of loan origination fees and related expenses. Interest and other income consists primarily of interest received on our cash balances.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

        Accounting policies where significant judgments and estimates are made include asset valuation related to bad debts and inventory obsolescence; sales returns and allowances; impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets; customer rebate obligations; realizability of deferred tax assets and self-insured medical reserves. A detailed description of these estimates and our policies to account for them is included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. Our estimates are based on historical experience as well as relevant facts and circumstances known to us at each reporting date. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

        We provide customary credit terms to our customers and generally do not require collateral. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of our customers and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical collections experience and expected collectibility of accounts. Our actual bad debts may differ from our estimates.

        In assessing the realization of inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future demand requirements and compare these with current and committed inventory levels. Our inventory requirements change based on our projected customer demand, which changes due to market conditions, technological and product life cycle changes and longer or shorter than expected usage periods. We maintain certain finished goods inventories near certain key customer locations in accordance with agreements. These customers are generally contractually obligated to assume materials liability after a specified period of time.

        We derive revenues primarily from the sale of printed circuit boards using customer supplied engineering and design plans and recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has transferred, and collectibility is reasonably assured—generally when products are shipped to the customer. We provide our customers a limited right of return for defective printed circuit boards. We accrue an estimated amount for sales returns and

20

allowances at the time of sale based on historical information. To the extent actual returns vary from our historical experience, revisions to the allowances may be required.

        We have significant long-lived tangible and intangible assets consisting of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and definite-lived intangibles. We review these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In addition, we perform an impairment test related to goodwill at least annually. Our goodwill and intangibles are attributable to our quick-turn business which has recently generated the majority of our cash flows. During the fourth fiscal quarter 2002, we performed an impairment assessment of our (i) goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which requires the use of a fair-value based analysis and (ii) long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, which requires the use of an analysis of expected future undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the asset. As of December 31, 2002, we determined that no impairment existed, except with respect to certain assets held for sale in connection with the closure of our Burlington, Washington facility. At June 30, 2003, we determined that there were no events or changes in circumstances which indicated that the carrying amount of long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our long-lived assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

        Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. At June 30, 2003, we have a net deferred income tax asset of $16.5 million. This amount is net of a valuation allowance of approximately $11.6 million which was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Advanced Circuits. Should our expectations of taxable income change in future periods, it may become necessary to record an additional valuation allowance, which would adversely affect our results of operations in the period such a determination is made. In addition, we record income tax expense or benefit at a rate that is based on expected results for the fiscal year. If future changes in market conditions cause actual results for the year to be more or less favorable than those expected, adjustments to the effective income tax rate could be required.

        We are self-insured for group health insurance benefits provided to our employees, and purchase insurance to protect against large claims at the individual and aggregate level. The insurance carrier adjudicates and processes employee claims and is paid a fee for these services. We reimburse our insurance carrier for paid claims subject to a variable monthly limitation. We estimate our exposure for claims incurred but not paid at the end of each reporting period and use historical information supplied by our insurance carrier and broker to estimate our liability for these claims. This liability is subject to a total limitation that varies based on employee enrollment and factors that are established at each annual contract renewal. Our actual claims experience may differ from our estimates.

        In connection with our acquisition of Advanced Circuits in December 2002, we became contractually responsible for the majority of a rebate obligation to a customer. The rebate is based on a percentage of net sales to this customer. We have made estimates regarding the amount and timing of future net sales to this customer and have applied a discount factor to the estimated rebates to estimate the present value of our obligation. At June 30, 2003, we estimated the present value of our total obligation to be $2.8 million. We have also estimated that portion of the total obligation which we believe is a current liability. Based on our future net sales experience with this customer and periodic reviews of our estimation methodology, we may change our estimate of this obligation and the portion that is a current liability.

21

Results of Operations

        The following table sets forth statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:

(1)

Reflects our December 2002 acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

First Two Fiscal Quarters 2003 Compared to First Two Fiscal Quarters 2002

        The first two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003 include the results of operations of Advanced Circuits, which was acquired in a stock purchase on December 26, 2002. Advanced Circuits' results of operations are not included in the first two fiscal quarters ended July 1, 2002. There were 181 and 182 days in the first two fiscal quarters 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        Net Sales.    In the first two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, our net sales mix shifted significantly towards the high-end computing end market and to a lesser extent towards the networking/communications infrastructure end market due to our acquisition of Advanced Circuits. Advanced Circuits accounted for over one-half of the total net sales for the first two fiscal quarters 2003, and a majority of its revenues are from the high-end computing and networking/communications infrastructure end markets. These end markets typically consist of products with high average layer counts. Our average layer count increased from 8.5 in the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to 13.9 in the first two fiscal quarters 2003.

22

        Net sales increased 71.6% from $47.0 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $80.7 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2003 due to the acquisition of Advanced Circuits. The net sales increase from Advanced Circuits was partially offset by a decline in net sales from our remaining facilities, due primarily to a reduction in the volume of printed circuit boards sold.

        Cost of Goods Sold.    Cost of goods sold increased $27.5 million, or 65.1%, from $42.2 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $69.7 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. Higher cost of goods sold resulted from higher labor, materials and variable overhead costs associated with an increase in the number of printed circuit boards sold. The volume of boards sold increased due to the acquisition of Advanced Circuits partially offset by lower volume sold at our remaining facilities. In addition, a reduction in fixed costs due to the closure of our Burlington, Washington facility in December 2002 favorably impacted our cost structure. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold decreased from 89.9% for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to 86.4% for the first two fiscal quarters 2003 due to improved absorption of fixed manufacturing overhead, principally depreciation; lower unit pricing for certain of our direct materials as a result of our greater purchasing power; and lower labor costs associated with a sales mix shift towards higher-layer count boards; partially offset by unabsorbed labor costs at certain of our facilities as well as higher direct materials costs associated with a sales mix shift towards higher layer-count boards. In connection with our acquisition of Advanced Circuits, no value was assigned to the acquired property and equipment and accordingly, we record no depreciation expense for the acquired assets. Expenditures for information technology salaries and expenses for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 have been reclassified to general and administrative expenses to conform to the presentation for the same period in 2003. This reclassification more appropriately reflects the overall corporate nature of our information technology expenses. As a percentage of net sales, the reclassification reduced cost of goods sold and increased gross profit by 1.0% in the first two fiscal quarters 2002.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased $6.2 million, or 129.2%, from $4.8 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $11.0 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. This gross profit increase resulted from the combination of a sales volume improvement and a gross margin improvement. The sales volume improvement was driven by the Advanced Circuits acquisition and was partially offset by a reduction in volume at our remaining facilities. The gross margin improved to 13.6% in the first two fiscal quarters 2003 from 10.1% in the first two fiscal quarters 2002 due to improved absorption of fixed manufacturing overhead, principally depreciation; lower unit pricing for certain of our direct materials as a result of our greater purchasing power; and lower labor costs as a result of our sales mix shift towards higher-layer count boards; partially offset by unabsorbed labor costs as well as higher direct materials costs due to our sales mix shift towards higher-layer count boards.

        Operating Expenses.    Selling and marketing expenses increased $2.0 million from $3.2 million, or 6.9% of net sales, for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $5.2 million, or 6.4% of net sales, for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. The decrease as a percentage of net sales resulted from improved absorption of fixed selling costs and a lower commission rate associated with a mix shift to more standard lead-time products due primarily to our acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

        General and administrative expenses increased $3.5 million from $2.1 million, or 4.5% of net sales, for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $5.6 million, or 6.9% of net sales, for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. The increase in expenses as a percentage of net sales resulted primarily from higher personnel costs principally attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Circuits; higher corporate governance expenses, principally higher directors' and officers' liability insurance premiums and accounting and legal fees; transition costs to integrate Advanced Circuits; and higher information technology costs, mostly attributable to Advanced Circuits. Information technology salaries and expenses for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 have been reclassified from cost of goods sold to general and administrative expenses to conform to the presentation for the same period in 2003.

23

        Amortization of intangibles was for intangible assets with finite lives from the Power Circuits acquisition, which occurred in July 1999. Amortization of intangibles was $0.6 million in both the first two fiscal quarters 2003 and 2002.

        Restructuring charges in the first fiscal quarter 2003 were $0.2 million for severance and other exit costs primarily related to eliminating 45 positions at our Redmond, Washington facility. Restructuring charges were incurred in the second fiscal quarter 2002 relating to our Burlington, Washington facility. We reduced the Burlington facility's labor force by 141 employees and recorded $0.9 million of restructuring charges. The charges were primarily severance costs.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased $0.3 million from $0.6 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $0.3 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2003 due to a lower average outstanding balance on our term loan partially offset by imputed interest expense on other long-term liabilities and higher amortization of debt issuance costs.

        Interest Income and Other, Net.    Interest income and other, net decreased $143,000 from income of $308,000 for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to income of $165,000 for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. This decrease resulted principally from lower interest income as a result of lower cash balances and interest rates.

        Income Taxes.    The benefit for income taxes decreased from $0.8 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 to $0.2 million for the first two fiscal quarters 2003. This income tax benefit resulted from a pretax net loss in 2002 and a pretax loss before extraordinary item in 2003. Our effective tax rate for the first two fiscal quarters 2002 and 2003 was 32.6% and 30.7%, respectively. Our effective tax rate is primarily impacted by certain non-deductible items. We record income tax expense or benefit at a rate that is based on expected results for the year. If actual results for the year are more or less favorable than those expected, adjustments to the effective income tax rate could be required.

        Extraordinary Item.    In the first two fiscal quarters 2003, we recorded an extraordinary gain of $0.8 million after resolving certain contingencies concerning the fair market value of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of our acquisition of Advanced Circuits. The extraordinary gain was due principally to the settlement of our claim for a working capital adjustment for $1.4 million, which was $0.6 million in excess of our estimate as of December 31, 2002. The fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the cost to purchase Advanced Circuits, resulting in negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the amount of negative goodwill was allocated proportionately to reduce the assigned values of acquired assets except current assets and deferred income taxes. The remaining unallocated negative goodwill was recorded as an extraordinary gain. We will continue our evaluation of fair market value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as remaining contingencies during the remainder of 2003 and may make further purchase accounting adjustments if appropriate.

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

        Net Sales.    Net sales decreased $40.0 million, or 31.0%, from $129.0 million in 2001 to $89.0 million in 2002. This decrease resulted from a decline in the volume of printed circuit boards sold and from lower pricing levels. Net sales declined due to a significant downturn that began in 2001 in the electronics industry and in the end markets served by our customers. Approximately $1.4 million of 2002 revenue resulted from our acquisition of Advanced Circuits in late December 2002.

        Cost of Goods Sold.    Cost of goods sold decreased $12.7 million, or 13.8%, from $92.2 million in 2001 to $79.5 million in 2002. The decrease in cost of goods sold resulted from lower labor, materials and variable overhead costs that were associated with a decline in the number of printed

24

circuit boards sold. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased from 71.5% in 2001 to 89.3% in 2002. Higher medical expense, higher depreciation expense and an increase in unabsorbed manufacturing overhead due to excess capacity resulted in a higher cost of goods sold percentage.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit decreased $27.3 million, or 74.2%, from $36.8 million in 2001 to $9.5 million in 2002. This decrease in gross profit resulted primarily from a lower volume of printed circuit boards sold and to a lesser extent from lower pricing levels. Our gross margin was 10.7% in 2002 compared to 28.5% in 2001. Gross margin decreased due to increased medical expense, increased depreciation expense and lower absorption of fixed manufacturing expenses.

        Operating Expenses.    Sales and marketing expenses decreased $0.9 million from $7.3 million in 2001 to $6.4 million in 2002. The decrease resulted from lower commissions to sales representatives due to lower net sales in 2002. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses increased from 5.6% in 2001 to 7.3% in 2002. The increase as a percentage of net sales was due to lower absorption of fixed sales and marketing expenses and higher average per-unit commissions related to a higher proportion of quick-turn sales in 2002.

        General and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million from $5.4 million in 2001 to $4.5 million in 2002. This decrease resulted from lower labor expense partially offset by higher costs for directors and officers insurance and a higher bad debt provision. As a percentage of sales, general administrative expenses increased to 5.0% of sales in 2002 from 4.2% of sales in 2001 because the 31.0% decrease in sales was greater than the 17.5% decrease in the absolute level of expense.

        Amortization of intangibles consists of amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets from the Power Circuits acquisition, which occurred in July 1999. Amortization of intangibles decreased $3.6 million from $4.8 million in 2001 to $1.2 million in 2002. This decrease resulted from our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," effective January 1, 2002. Under the new rules, goodwill is not amortized, rather it is subject to impairment testing. The amortization expense recorded in 2002 was for definite-lived intangible assets.

        We consolidated manufacturing capabilities by closing our Burlington, Washington, facility in the fourth fiscal quarter 2002. As a result of this consolidation, we recorded restructuring charges of $3.9 million in 2002 of which $1.8 million is a non-cash impairment charge to write-down building, property and equipment held for sale to its estimated net realizable value and approximately $2.1 million relates to severance and other exit costs. We have laid off approximately 193 employees in connection with the restructuring.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased $1.5 million from $2.6 million in 2001 to $1.1 million in 2002. This decrease resulted from a lower interest rate on our term loan as well as a lower balance due to repayment of principal. The expiration of an interest rate swap agreement on December 31, 2001, also contributed to the decline in interest expense through a reduction in our effective interest rate.

        Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs.    Amortization of debt issuance costs increased $64,000 from $41,000 in 2001 to $105,000 in 2002. In December 2002, we prepaid approximately $14.5 million of our borrowings under our senior credit facility in connection with the closing of our acquisition of Advanced Circuits. As a result of our prepayment of indebtedness, we wrote off additional debt issuance costs.

        Interest Income and Other, Net.    Interest income and other, net, increased $0.1 million from income of $0.6 million in 2001 to income of $0.7 million in 2002. This increase resulted from higher cash balances, partially offset by lower interest rates earned.

25

        Income Taxes.    The provision for income taxes decreased from a provision of $6.2 million in 2001 to a benefit of $2.3 million in 2002. This income tax benefit resulted from a pretax net loss. Our effective income tax rate in 2002 was (32.6)%, and it was 36% in 2001. Our effective income tax rate is primarily impacted by certain non-deductible items.

        Extraordinary Item.    In 2002, we recorded an extraordinary gain of $6.3 million as part of our acquisition of Advanced Circuits. The fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the cost to purchase Advanced Circuits, resulting in negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the amount of negative goodwill was allocated proportionately to reduce the assigned values of acquired assets except current assets and deferred income taxes. The remaining unallocated negative goodwill was recorded as an extraordinary gain. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for the description of the extraordinary gain.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

        Net Sales.    Net sales decreased $74.7 million, or 36.7%, from $203.7 million in 2000 to $129.0 million in 2001. This decrease resulted primarily from a decline in the volume of printed circuit boards sold. Net sales declined due to a significant downturn in the electronics industry and the end markets we serve.

        Cost of Goods Sold.    Cost of goods sold decreased $34.9 million, or 27.5%, from $127.1 million in 2000 to $92.2 million in 2001. Lower cost of goods sold resulted from a decline in the number of printed circuit boards sold, combined with a work force reduction and decreased employee overtime, partially offset by higher depreciation expense. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased from 62.4% in 2000 to 71.5% in 2001. The reduced revenue base caused an increase in unabsorbed manufacturing overhead, resulting in higher cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit decreased $39.8 million, or 52.0%, from $76.6 million in 2000 to $36.8 million in 2001. This decrease in gross profit resulted from a lower volume of printed circuit boards sold. Our gross margin was 28.5% during 2001, compared to 37.6% for 2000. Gross margin decreased due to lower absorption of fixed manufacturing expenses.

        Operating Expenses.    Sales and marketing expenses decreased $2.9 million, or 28.4%, from $10.2 million in 2000 to $7.3 million in 2001. The decrease resulted from lower commissions due to lower net sales in 2001.

        General and administrative expenses decreased $2.9 million, or 34.6%, from $8.3 million in 2000 to $5.4 million in 2001. This decrease resulted from a lower bad debt provision, reduced incentive compensation, a decline in office rent expense and lower legal and accounting fees. The lower bad debt provision was due to a smaller accounts receivable balance and an improved aging of accounts receivable in 2001.

        Amortization of intangibles consists of amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets from the Power Circuits acquisition, which occurred in July 1999. Amortization of intangibles was $4.8 million for both 2001 and 2000.

        With the proceeds of our initial public offering in September 2000, we bought out our deferred retention bonus plan. Therefore, we recorded no amortization of the deferred retention bonus in 2001 as compared to $5.5 million for 2000.

        In conjunction with our initial public offering in September 2000, we amended and consolidated our management agreements with T.C. Management, T.C. Management IV and Brockway Moran & Partners Management. Under the amended agreement, we are not required to pay management and consulting fees, although we are required to pay financial advisory fees in the

26

event of certain transactions as defined in the amended agreement. We had no management fees and related expenses in 2001, compared to $2.2 million in 2000.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased $9.6 million from $12.2 million in 2000 to $2.6 million in 2001. This decrease resulted primarily from our repayment of indebtedness with the proceeds of our initial public offering and cash flow from operations. This repayment significantly reduced our debt and decreased our accompanying level of interest expense.

        Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs.    Amortization of debt issuance costs decreased $701,000 from $742,000 in 2000 to $41,000 in 2001. As a result of our repayment of indebtedness and the refinancing of our senior credit facility in September 2000, we wrote off a significant portion of our debt issuance costs.

        Interest Income and Other, Net.    Interest income and other, net, which includes rental income, increased $448,000 from $181,000 in 2000 to $629,000 in 2001. This change was due primarily to increased interest income earned on our higher average cash balance during 2001, partially offset by a decrease in net rental income. Net rental income decreased from $100,000 for 2000 to a net expense of $106,000 for 2001 due to the termination of a sublease to allow for the expansion of our Santa Ana, California, facility.

        Income Taxes.    The provision for income taxes decreased from a net benefit of $1.9 million in 2000 to an expense of $6.2 million in 2001. The net benefit of $1.9 million in 2000 was due to higher pretax income offset by a one-time $14.8 million benefit recorded from eliminating our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Our effective tax rate for 2001 was 36%.

        Extraordinary Items.    In 2000, we recorded a loss of $6.8 million, net of a tax benefit of $3.1 million, to extinguish subordinated debt obligations carried at a discount and to write off debt issuance costs related to repayments and refinancing of our senior credit facility. We recorded no extraordinary items in 2001.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations, proceeds from our public offerings and borrowings under our senior credit facility. Our principal uses of cash have been to meet debt service requirements, finance capital expenditures and finance mergers and acquisitions. We anticipate that these uses will continue to be the principal demands on our cash in the future. As of June 30, 2003, we had working capital of approximately $40.6 million, compared to $40.4 million as of December 31, 2002.

        Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.7 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2003, compared to $5.8 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2002, due primarily to receipt of a $5.7 million income tax refund in 2003 compared to a $3.7 million refund in 2002; conversion to cash of certain of the net working capital assets of Advanced Circuits that were acquired on December 26, 2002; and net income of $0.3 million for the two quarters ended June 30, 2003 compared to a net loss of $1.6 million for the two quarters ended July 1, 2002. The difference between our net income in the first two fiscal quarters 2003 of $0.3 million and our $14.7 million operating cash flow was primarily attributable to a decrease of $5.2 million in income taxes receivable, $4.6 million of depreciation and amortization expenses, a $2.5 million decrease in inventories, a $2.5 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other, a $1.5 million increase in accrued expenses, and a $1.3 million decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in accounts payable, a $0.8 million extraordinary gain, a $0.2 million increase in deferred income taxes, and a $0.1 million gain on sale of property, plant and equipment.

        Net cash used in investing activities was $1.8 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2003, compared to $2.6 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2002. In the two fiscal quarters ended

27

June 30, 2003 we purchased $1.7 million of property, plant and equipment and $0.4 million of finite-lived intangibles and we received $0.3 million in proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment. In the same period of 2002, we purchased $2.6 million of property, plant and equipment.

        Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2003, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $11.8 million in the first two fiscal quarters 2002. In the first two fiscal quarters 2003, we received proceeds of $0.4 million from employee stock option exercises and incurred $0.2 million of fees in connection with amending our credit agreement. In the same period of 2002, we received net proceeds of $15.3 million from a secondary stock offering, as well as $0.4 million of proceeds from employee stock option exercises and made principal repayments of $3.9 million on our long-term debt. In the fourth fiscal quarter 2002, we initiated a repurchase program for our common shares. We repurchased $0.2 million of our common stock in 2002, but did not repurchase any shares during the first two fiscal quarters 2003.

        We entered into an amendment of our senior credit agreement as of April 30, 2003. We have a term loan with a remaining balance of $10.0 million that is payable in nine equal quarterly installments beginning on September 30, 2003 with a final maturity of September 30, 2005. We have a committed revolving loan facility of $25.0 million with a final maturity date of September 29, 2005. We may prepay the term loan and borrow, repay and reborrow under the revolving loan facility at any time. The term loan and the revolving loan bear interest at rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.5% to 2.5% or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus 0.5% to 1.0%. The amount added to the LIBOR rate or the Alternative Base Rate varies depending upon the Company's leverage ratio as defined in the agreement. As of June 30, 2003, the term loan had an interest rate of 3.10%. Since the amendment effective date of April 30, 2003, our borrowings under the revolving facility are subject to a borrowing base or formula that is based on our accounts receivable and inventory. As of June 30, 2003 we had no outstanding revolving loan balances, and we were in compliance with our financial covenants. We pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.30% to 0.45% on the unused revolving commitment amount. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets and contains financial covenants customary for this type of financing, and as of June 30, 2003, we were in compliance with the covenants. As of June 30, 2003, we had $10.2 million of available borrowing capacity under our revolving loan facility.

        The following table provides information on future payments under the Company's credit facility, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases and other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet under generally accepted accounting principles as of June 30, 2003 (in thousands):

(1)

Amounts shown are estimated gross payments pursuant to a contractual rebate obligation with a customer that we assumed in connection with our acquisition of Advanced Circuits. The amount reflected on our balance sheet as other long-term liabilities is the difference between the net present value of these estimated gross payments and the estimated gross payments due within the first year. The net present value of the contractual liability will differ from the gross payments shown due to our estimate of the timing of gross payments and the interest rate used to discount these gross payments (see "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates").

        Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash generated from operations, available cash and amounts available under our senior credit facility will be adequate to meet the

28

debt service requirements, capital expenditures and working capital needs of our current operations for at least the next 12 months. We may require additional financing if we decide to consummate additional acquisitions. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results."

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

        All of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, and as a result, we have relatively little exposure to foreign currency exchange risk with respect to sales made.

Impact of Inflation

        We believe that our results of operations are not dependent upon moderate changes in the inflation rate as we expect that we will be able to pass along component price increases to our customers.

Seasonality

        We have historically experienced lower sales in our second and third fiscal quarters due to patterns in the capital budgeting and purchasing cycles of our customers and the end markets they serve. In particular, this effect is caused by the seasonality of our high-end computing segment. We expect to mitigate the impact of seasonality through diversification of our customer base.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This statement requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which the asset is placed in service. When the liability is initially recorded, entities capitalize a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, entities either settle the obligation for its recorded amount or incur a gain or loss upon settlement. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with earlier adoption encouraged. We adopted SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003, and the adoption did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position.

        In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." The Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishments of Debt," and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." SFAS No. 145 recognizes that the use of debt extinguishments can be a part of the risk management strategy of a company and hence, the classification of all early extinguishments of debt as an extraordinary item may no longer be appropriate. In addition, the Statement amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. Provisions of this Statement, as they relate to Statement No. 13, are to be effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. Provisions, which relate to Statement No. 4, are effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. We adopted SFAS No. 145 effective January 1, 2003, and the adoption did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position.

        In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." Under SFAS No. 146, a company will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. A liability is incurred when an event obligates the entity to transfer or use assets (i.e., when an event leaves the company little or no discretion to avoid transferring or using the assets in the future).

29

Under previous accounting rules, if a company's management approved an exit plan, the company generally could record the costs of that plan as a liability on the approval date, even if the company did not incur the costs until a later date. Under Statement No. 146, some of those costs might qualify for immediate recognition, others might be spread over one or more quarters, and still others might not be recorded until incurred in a much later period. We adopted SFAS No. 146 effective January 1, 2003, which did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position.

        In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment to FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock- based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require more prominent and more frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects of stock-based compensation. The transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. We have elected to continue using the intrinsic method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation. We adopted the interim disclosure requirements in our consolidated condensed financial statements beginning in the first fiscal quarter 2003.

        In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN No. 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others", which expands previously issued accounting guidance and disclosure requirements for certain guarantees. FIN 45 requires recognition of an initial liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed by issuing a guarantee. Guarantees are required to be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements starting with the period ending after December 15, 2002. For certain guarantees issued after December 31, 2002, the fair value of the obligation must be reported on the balance sheet. We adopted FIN No. 45 effective January 1, 2003 and it did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN No. 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51," which addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined therein and applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. We adopted FIN No. 46 in 2003 and it did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." The new statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity. The provisions of SFAS No. 150 apply to the classification and disclosure requirements for the following three types of financial instruments: Mandatorily Redeemable Instruments, Instruments with Repurchase Obligations, and Instruments with Obligations to Issue a Variable Number of Securities. The new reporting and disclosure requirements for SFAS No. 150 become effective for the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 or for any covered instruments entered into or modified subsequent to May 31, 2003. We have not completed its analysis of the potential impacts from adopting the new reporting requirements of SFAS No. 150.

30

BUSINESS

Overview

        We are a one-stop provider of time-critical and technologically complex printed circuit boards, which serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic products. We serve high-end commercial markets—including networking/communications infrastructure, high-end computing and industrial/medical—which are characterized by high levels of complexity, short life cycles and moderate production volumes. Our customers include OEMs and electronic manufacturing services companies. We significantly enhanced our capability to manufacture technologically complex printed circuit boards through our December 2002 acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

Industry Background

        Printed circuit boards are manufactured from sheets of laminated material, or panels. Each panel is typically subdivided into multiple printed circuit boards, each consisting of a pattern of electrical circuitry etched from copper to provide an electrical connection between the components mounted to it.

        Printed circuit boards serve as the foundation for virtually all electronic products, ranging from consumer products (such as cellular telephones and personal computers) to high-end commercial electronic equipment (such as medical equipment, data communications routers and switches, and servers). Generally, consumer electronics products utilize commodity-type printed circuit boards with lower layer counts, less complexity and larger production runs. High-end commercial equipment products require more customized, multilayer printed circuit boards using advanced technologies. In addition, most commercial end-markets have low volume requirements that demand a highly flexible manufacturing environment. As producing sophisticated circuit boards becomes more complex, high-end manufacturers must continually invest in advanced production equipment, engineering and process technology, and a skilled workforce.

        According to Henderson Ventures, the worldwide market for printed circuit boards was approximately $31.3 billion in 2002, with North America comprising 16.8%, or $5.2 billion. As a result of consolidation and the slowdown in the electronics industry in 2001 and 2002, many manufacturing facilities were closed, reducing North American printed circuit board manufacturing capacity by an estimated 30 to 40%. Management believes that this reduced capacity will provide significant opportunities to well-capitalized manufacturers that have advanced technological capabilities, particularly if the global electronics industry improves.

        We see several trends for the printed circuit board manufacturing industry. These include:

        Short electronic product life cycles.    Continual advances in technology have shortened the life cycles of complex electronic products, placing greater pressure on OEMs to quickly bring new products to market. The accelerated time-to-market and ramp-to-volume needs of OEMs of high-end commercial equipment creates opportunities for printed circuit board manufacturers that can offer engineering support in the prototype stage and manufacturing scalability throughout the production life cycle.

        Increasing complexity of electronic products.    OEMs are continually designing higher performance electronic products, which require technologically complex printed circuit boards that can accommodate higher speeds and component densities. These complex printed circuit boards often require very high layer counts, advanced manufacturing processes and high-mix production capabilities. OEMs are increasingly relying upon larger printed circuit board manufacturers who possess the financial resources necessary to invest in advanced manufacturing process technologies and sophisticated engineering staff, often to the exclusion of smaller printed circuit board manufacturers which do not possess such technology or resources.

31

        Increasing competition from Asian manufacturers.    In recent years, many electronics manufacturers have moved their production to Asia to take advantage of its exceptionally large, low-cost labor pool. This is particularly true for consumer electronics producers that utilize commodity-type printed circuit boards with lower layer counts and complexity. These less sophisticated printed circuit boards are generally mass produced and have experienced significant pricing pressures from Asian manufacturers. Printed circuit boards requiring complex technologies, advanced manufacturing processes, quick turnaround times or high-mix production are subject to less foreign competition. In addition, many of the unique challenges involved in successfully designing and manufacturing highly complex printed circuit boards—and the ongoing capital investment required to maintain state-of-the-art capabilities—have effectively served as barriers to entry in these high-mix and high-complexity segments of the domestic printed circuit board industry.

        Decreased reliance on multiple printed circuit board manufacturers by OEMs.    OEMs have traditionally relied on multiple printed circuit board manufacturers to provide different services as an electronic product moves through its life cycle. The transfer of a product among different printed circuit board manufacturers often results in increased costs and inefficiencies due to incompatible technologies and manufacturing processes and production delays. As a result, OEMs are reducing the number of printed circuit board manufacturers on which they rely, presenting an opportunity for those that can offer one-stop manufacturing capabilities—from prototype to volume production.

The TTM Solution

        We manufacture printed circuit boards that satisfy all stages of an electronic product's life cycle—from prototype to volume production—for targeted commercial end markets. Key aspects of our solution include:

•

One-stop manufacturing solution.  We offer a one-stop manufacturing solution to our customers through our specialized facilities, each of which generally focuses on a different stage of an electronic product's life cycle. This one-stop solution allows us to provide a broad array of services and technologies to meet the rapidly evolving needs of our customer base.



•

Quick-turn services.  We deliver highly complex printed circuit boards to customers in as little as 24 hours. This rapid delivery service enables OEMs to develop sophisticated electronic products quickly and reduce time to market. In addition, our quick-turn services provide us with an opportunity to capture additional business, including high-mix and volume production in our targeted end markets.



•

Strong process and technology expertise.  We deliver time-critical and highly complex manufacturing services through our advanced manufacturing processes and technology expertise. We regularly manufacture printed circuit boards with up to 32 layers. For the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, approximately 62% of our gross sales involved the manufacture of printed circuit boards with at least 12 layers, an industry-accepted measure of complexity.

Our Manufacturing Services

Quick-turn

        We refer to our rapid turnaround services as "quick-turn" because we provide custom-designed printed circuit boards to our customers within as little as 24 hours to 10 days. As a result of our ability to rapidly and reliably respond to the critical time requirements of our customers, we generally receive a premium for our quick-turn services.

•

Prototype production.  In the design, testing and launch phase of a new electronic product's life cycle, our customers typically require limited quantities of printed circuit boards in a very

32

short period of time. We satisfy this need by manufacturing prototype printed circuit boards in small quantities of up to 50 boards per order with delivery times ranging from as little as 24 hours to 10 days.

•

Ramp-to-volume production.  After a product has successfully completed the prototype phase, our customers introduce the product to the market and require larger quantities of printed circuit boards in a short period of time. This transition stage between low-volume prototype production and volume production is known as ramp-to-volume. Our ramp-to-volume services typically include manufacturing up to several hundred printed circuit boards per order with delivery times ranging from two to 10 days.

        For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, orders with delivery requirements of 10 days or less represented 40% and 45% of our gross sales, respectively. Quick-turn orders decreased to approximately 28% of our gross sales for the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003 primarily due to the change in order mix resulting from our acquisition of Advanced Circuits.

Standard delivery time

        Our standard delivery time services focus on the high-mix and complex technology requirements of our customers, with delivery times typically ranging from three to five weeks. High-mix manufacturing involves processing small lots, generally up to several hundred printed circuit boards, in a flexible manufacturing environment. Our high technology expertise is evidenced by our ability to regularly produce complex printed circuit boards with up to 32 layers in volumes that satisfy our customers' entire production needs. In addition, many of our lower layer-count circuit boards are complex as a result of the incorporation of other technologically advanced features, including high performance materials and extremely fine geometries and tolerances. Our acquisition of Advanced Circuits significantly increased our ability to produce technologically complex printed circuit boards for high-end commercial applications. As a result, our average layer count increased from 8.5 in the first two fiscal quarters of 2002 to 13.9 in the first two fiscal quarters of 2003. We do not target our standard delivery time services to high-volume, consumer electronic applications such as cellular telephones, personal computers, hand-held devices and automotive products.

Strategy

        Our goal is to be the leading provider of time-critical, one-stop manufacturing services for highly complex printed circuit boards. Key aspects of our strategy include:

        Leveraging our one-stop manufacturing solution.    Our quick-turn capabilities allow us to establish relationships with customers early in a product's life cycle, giving us an advantage in securing preferred vendor status for subsequent ramp-to-volume and volume production opportunities. We also seek to gain quick-turn business from our existing ramp-to-volume and volume customers.

        Using our quick-turn capabilities to attract new customers with high-growth potential.    Our time-to-market philosophy capitalizes on the rapid introduction and short product life cycle of advanced electronic products. We continue to attract emerging companies to our Santa Ana facility and believe that our ability to rapidly and reliably respond to the critical time requirements of our customers provides us with a significant competitive advantage.

        Continuing to improve our technological capabilities and manufacturing processes.    We are consistently among the first to adopt new developments in printed circuit board manufacturing processes and technology. We continuously evaluate new manufacturing processes and technology to further reduce our delivery times, improve quality, increase yields and decrease costs. As a result of

33

our strong balance sheet, we believe that we are well-positioned to invest in technologies that are required by the leading OEMs in the electronics industry.

        Capitalizing on facility specialization to enhance operating efficiency.    We utilize a facility specialization strategy in which each order is directed to the facility best suited to the customer's particular delivery time, product complexity and volume needs. Our three facilities use compatible technologies and manufacturing processes, allowing us to move orders easily between plants to optimize operating efficiency. This strategy provides customers with faster delivery times and enhanced product quality and consistency.

        Expanding our presence in targeted niche markets through internal initiatives and selective acquisitions.    We actively target technologies and business opportunities that enhance our competitive position in selected market niches. We intend to pursue high-end commercial customers, such as military/aerospace companies, which demand flexible and advanced manufacturing processes, expertise with high-performance specialty materials and other high-mix and complex technology capabilities. Our acquisition of Advanced Circuits exemplifies our ability to successfully expand our complex technology and specialty materials expertise, and we will consider additional acquisitions that increase our position in our targeted markets.

Manufacturing Technology

        The market for our products is characterized by rapidly evolving technology. In recent years, the trend in the electronic products industry has been to increase the speed, complexity, and performance of components while reducing their size. We believe our technological capabilities allow us to address the needs of manufacturers who must bring complicated electronic products to market faster.

        To manufacture printed circuit boards, we generally receive circuit designs directly from our customers in the form of computer data files, which we review to ensure data accuracy and product manufacturability. Processing these computer files with computer aided design (CAD) technology, we generate images of the circuit patterns that we then physically develop on individual layers, using advanced photographic processes. Through a variety of plating and etching processes, we selectively add and remove conductive materials to form horizontal layers of thin circuits, called traces, which are separated by insulating material. A finished multilayer circuit board laminates together a number of layers of circuitry, using intense heat and pressure under vacuum. Vertical connections between layers are achieved by plating through small holes, called vias. Vias are made by highly specialized drilling equipment capable of achieving extremely fine tolerances with high accuracy. We specialize in high layer-count printed circuit boards with extremely fine geometries and tolerances. Because of the tolerances involved, we employ clean rooms in certain manufacturing processes where tiny particles might otherwise create defects on the circuit patterns. We also use automated optical inspection systems to ensure consistent quality.

        We believe that our highly specialized equipment and advanced manufacturing processes enable us to reliably produce printed circuit boards with the following characteristics:

•

High layer count.  Manufacturing printed circuit boards with higher numbers of layers is difficult to accomplish due to the greater number of processes required. We regularly manufacture printed circuit boards with up to 32 layers on a quick-turn and volume basis. As a result of our acquisition of Advanced Circuits, our average layer count increased from 8.5 in the first two fiscal quarters of 2002 to 13.9 in the first two quarters of 2003. For the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, approximately 62% of our gross sales involved the manufacture of printed circuit boards with at least 12 layers, an industry accepted measure of complexity.

34

•

Blind and buried vias.  Vias are drilled holes which provide electrical connectivity between layers of circuitry in a printed circuit board. Blind vias connect the surface layer of the printed circuit board to the nearest inner layer. Buried vias are holes that do not reach either surface of the printed circuit board but allow inner layers to be interconnected. Products with blind and buried vias can be made thinner, smaller, lighter and with higher component density and more functionality than products with traditional vias.



•

Buried capacitance.  Buried capacitance technology involves embedding the capacitive and resistive elements inside the printed circuit board, which allows for removal of passive components from the surface of the printed circuit board and thereby leaves more surface area for active components. Use of this technology results in greater design flexibility and products with higher component density and increased functionality.



•

Fine line traces and spaces.  Traces are the connecting copper lines between the different components of the printed circuit board and spaces are the distances between traces. The smaller the traces and tighter the spaces, the higher the density on the printed circuit board and the greater the expertise required to achieve a desired final yield on an order. We are able to provide .003 inch traces and spaces.



•

High aspect ratios.  The aspect ratio is the ratio between the thickness of the printed circuit board and the diameter of a drilled hole. The higher the ratio, the greater the difficulty to reliably form, electroplate and finish all the holes on a printed circuit board. We are able to provide aspect ratios of up to 15:1.



•

Thin core processing.  A core is the basic inner-layer building block material from which printed circuit boards are constructed. A core consists of a flat sheet of material comprised of glass-reinforced resin with copper foil on either side. The thickness of inner-layer cores is determined by the overall thickness of the printed circuit board and the number of layers required. The demand for thinner cores derives from requirements of thinner printed circuit boards, higher layer counts and various electrical parameters. Core thickness in our printed circuit boards ranges from as little as 0.002 inches up to 0.062 inches.



•

Microvias.  Microvias are small vias with diameters generally between 0.001 inches and 0.005 inches after plating. These very small vias consume much less space on the layers they interconnect, thereby providing for greater wiring densities and closer spacing of components and their attachment pads. The fabrication of printed circuit boards with microvias requires specialized equipment, such as laser drills, and highly developed process knowledge. Applications such as handheld wireless devices employ microvias to obtain a higher degree of functionality from a given surface area.



•

Fulfill™ hole fill process.  Our Fulfill™ process provides designers the opportunity to increase the density of component placements by reducing the surface area required to place many types of components. In traditional design, components are routed from their surface interfaces through via connections in order to access power and ground connections and the internal circuitry used to connect to other discrete components. Fulfill™ provides a method to allow for vias to be placed inside their respective surface mount pads by filling the vias with a thermoset epoxy and plating flat copper surface mount pads directly over the filled hole.



•

Advanced materials.  We manufacture circuit boards using a wide variety of advanced insulating materials. These high-performance materials offer electrical, thermal, and long-term reliability advantages over conventional materials but are more difficult to manufacture. We are certified by Underwriters Laboratories to manufacture printed circuit boards using many

35

types and combinations of these specialty materials. This wide offering allows us to manufacture complex boards for niche, high-end commercial markets.

Customers and Markets

        Our customers include both OEMs and electronic manufacturing services providers that primarily serve the networking/communications, industrial/medical, and high-end computing segments of the electronics industry. We measure customers as those companies that have placed at least two orders in the preceding 12-month period. As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately 565 customers, and as of June 30, 2003, we had approximately 590 customers.

        We sell to OEMs both directly and through electronic manufacturing service companies. Our significant customers include:

        The following table shows the percentage of our net sales attributable to each of the principal end markets we served for the periods indicated:

(1)

Sales to electronic manufacturing services providers are classified by the end markets of their customers.

        Sales to our 10 largest customers accounted for 46.1% of our net sales in 2001, 41.8% of our net sales in 2002, and 65.2% of our net sales for the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003. Sales

36

to Solectron and Celestica accounted for 21.9% and 15.1%, respectively, of our net sales for the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003. The majority of our sales to Solectron and Celestica were on behalf of Cisco, IBM and Sun Microsystems. We generally negotiate product pricing and volume directly with our OEM customers, rather than with the electronic manufacturing services companies.

        For the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2003, approximately 70.8% of our net sales were in the United States, 9.9% in Malaysia, 7.5% in Italy, 5.7% in Canada, and the remainder primarily in other European and Asian countries.

Sales and Marketing

        Our marketing strategy focuses on building long-term relationships with our customers' engineering and new product introduction personnel early in the product development phase. As the product moves from the prototype stage through ramp-to-volume and volume production, we shift our focus to the customers' procurement department in order to capture sales at each point in the product's life cycle.

        Our staff of engineers, sales support, and managers assist our sales representatives in advising customers with respect to manufacturing feasibility, design review, and technology limits through direct communication and visits. We combine our sales efforts with customer service at each facility to better serve our customers. Each customer is assigned one salesperson for all services across all facilities, in order to establish individual accountability for each client.

        Our sales force is comprised primarily of commission-based, independent sales representatives, who are complemented by a direct sales force. We expanded our sales force from 85 at year-end 2001 to 107 at December 31, 2002 with the addition of Advanced Circuits' sales employees. We believe that this will allow us to capture new customers and gain market share as the printed circuit board industry consolidates.

        Our acquisition of Advanced Circuits also broadened our geographic reach. Specifically, we expanded our international presence to include inventory hubs in Italy, Scotland, Canada and Malaysia and sales offices in Scotland, England and Singapore. This expanded international presence enables us to access new customers and allows us to better serve existing ones.

Suppliers

        The primary raw materials used by us include copper-clad layers of fiberglass of varying thicknesses, impregnated with bonding materials; chemical solutions such as copper and gold for plating operations; photographic film; carbide drill bits; and plastic for testing fixtures.

        We use just-in-time procurement practices to maintain our raw materials inventory at low levels and work closely with our suppliers to obtain technologically advanced raw materials. Although we have preferred suppliers for some raw materials, most of our raw materials are generally readily available in the open market from numerous other potential suppliers. In addition, we periodically seek alternative supply sources to ensure that we are receiving competitive pricing and service. Adequate amounts of all raw materials have been available in the past, and we believe this availability will continue into the foreseeable future.

Competition

        Despite industry consolidation, the printed circuit board industry is fragmented and characterized by intense competition. Our principal competitors include DDi, Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Merix, Sanmina-SCI and Tyco.

37

        We believe we compete favorably, based on the following competitive factors:

•

ability to offer one-stop manufacturing capabilities;



•

ability to offer time-to-market capabilities;



•

capability and flexibility to produce technologically complex products;



•

flexibility to manufacture high-mix products;



•

consistent high-quality product; and



•

outstanding customer service.

        In addition, we believe our continuous evaluation and early adoption of new manufacturing and production technologies give us a competitive advantage. We believe that our ability to manufacture printed circuit boards using advanced technologies such as blind and buried vias, larger panel size, sequential lamination, and smaller traces and spaces provide us with a competitive advantage over manufacturers that do not possess these technological capabilities. We believe these advanced manufacturing and production technologies are increasingly replacing and making obsolete the older technologies. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and enhance our manufacturing capabilities and production technologies.

Backlog

        Although we obtain firm purchase orders from our customers, our customers typically do not make firm orders for delivery of products more than 30 to 60 days in advance. In addition, orders may be rescheduled or canceled, and the products in the markets which we serve are characterized by increasingly short product life cycles. Therefore, we believe that backlog information is not material to an understanding of our business.

Governmental Regulation

        Our operations are subject to federal, state and local regulatory requirements relating to environmental compliance and site cleanups, waste management and health and safety matters. In particular, we are subject to regulations promulgated by:

•

the Occupational Safety and Health Administration pertaining to health and safety in the workplace;



•

the Environmental Protection Agency pertaining to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used in the manufacturing processes; and



•

corresponding state, county and city agencies.

        To date, the costs of compliance and environmental remediation have not been material to us. Nevertheless, additional or modified requirements may be imposed in the future. If such additional or modified requirements are imposed on us, or if conditions requiring remediation are found to exist, we may be required to incur substantial additional expenditures.

38

Employees

        As of August 25, 2003, we had 1,310 employees, none of whom were represented by unions. Of these employees, 1,188 were involved in manufacturing and engineering, 61 worked in sales and marketing, and 61 worked in accounting, systems and other support capacities. We have not experienced any labor problems resulting in a work stoppage and believe that we have good relations with our employees.

Facilities

        Our principal manufacturing facilities are as follows:

        We own all of our current manufacturing and administrative office facilities. Our owned facilities are subject to mortgages under our senior credit facility.

        While we own our former manufacturing facility in Burlington, Washington, it is subject to a land lease that expires in July 2025. In connection with a restructuring charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2002, we closed our Burlington, Washington facility and have listed it for sale. We also lease a sales office in Hopkins, Minnesota. This sales office contains approximately 8,700 square feet and the lease expires in March 2004.

Legal Proceedings

        From time to time we may become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We were advised that we have been added as a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona by Lemelson Medical, Education and Research Foundation, Limited Partnership. The suit alleges that we have infringed certain "machine vision" and other patents owned by the plaintiff and seeks injunctive relief, damages for the alleged infringements and payment of the plaintiff's attorneys' fees. Although the ultimate outcome of this matter is not currently determinable, we believe we have meritorious defenses to these allegations and, based in part on the licensing terms offered by the Lemelson Partnership, do not expect this litigation to materially impact our business, results of operations or financial condition. However, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for any quarter. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will prevail in any such litigation.

39

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

        The following table, together with the accompanying text, presents certain information as of July 31, 2003, with respect to each of our directors and executive officers.

        Kenton K. Alder has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and Director since March 1999. From January 1997 to July 1998, Mr. Alder served as Vice President of Tyco Printed Circuit Group Inc., a printed circuit board manufacturer. Prior to that time, Mr. Alder served as President and Chief Executive Officer of ElectroStar, Inc., previously a publicly held printed circuit board manufacturing company, from December 1994 to December 1996. From January 1987 to November 1994, Mr. Alder served as President of Lundahl Astro Circuits Inc., a predecessor company to ElectroStar. Mr. Alder holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance and a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Utah State University.

        James K. Bass has served as our Director since September 2000. Mr. Bass has been the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Suntron Corporation, a publicly held provider of high-mix electronic manufacturing services, since its incorporation in May 2001 and as Chief Executive Officer of EFTC Corporation, a subsidiary of Suntron, since July 2000. From 1996 to July 2000, Mr. Bass was a Senior Vice President of Sony Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Bass spent 15 years in various manufacturing management positions at the aerospace group of General Electric Corporation. Mr. Bass holds a B.S.M.E. from Ohio State University.

        Richard P. Beck has served as our Director since February 2001. Mr. Beck is presently retired. From November 2001 to May 2002, Mr. Beck served as Senior Vice President of Advanced Energy Industries, a publicly held manufacturer of power conversion systems and integrated technology solutions. From February 1998 to November 2001, Mr. Beck served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Energy, and continues to serve as a Director of the company. From March 1992 until February 1998, Mr. Beck served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Energy. From November 1987 to March 1992, Mr. Beck served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Cimage Corporation, a computer software company. Mr. Beck is also Chairman of the board, is chairman of the audit committee and serves on the compensation committee of Applied Films Corporation, a publicly held manufacturer of flat panel display equipment. He is also a Director of Photon Dynamics, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of flat panel display test equipment, and is chairman of its audit committee. Mr. Beck holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Finance and a Master of Business Administration from Babson College.

40

        Jeffrey W. Goettman has served as our Chairman and Director since January 1999. Mr. Goettman has been a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital Partners, a private equity investment company, since April 2001. Mr. Goettman joined Thayer Capital Partners in February 1998. Prior to that time, Mr. Goettman served as a Managing Director and founder of the Electronics Manufacturing Services Group at Robertson Stephens & Co. Inc., an investment bank, from February 1994 to February 1998. In addition, Mr. Goettman has been the Chairman of the Board of Suntron Corporation since May 2001. Mr. Goettman holds a Bachelor of Science from Duke University and a Master of Business Administration from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

        John G. Mayer has served as our Director since September 2000. Mr. Mayer is presently retired. From January 1997 to November 1999, Mr. Mayer served as Vice President of Tyco Printed Circuit Group, Inc., a printed circuit board manufacturer. Mr. Mayer served as Chief Operating Officer of ElectroStar, Inc., previously a publicly held printed circuit board manufacturing company, from December 1994 to December 1996. From April 1986 to November 1994, Mr. Mayer served as President of Electro-Etch Circuits, Inc., a predecessor company to ElectroStar. Mr. Mayer holds a Bachelor of Arts in History, the Arts and Letters from Yale University and a Juris Doctor from UCLA School of Law.

        Douglas P. McCormick has served as our Director since September 1999. Mr. McCormick has been a Managing Director of Thayer Capital Partners, a private equity investment company, since January 2001, and was a Vice President and Principal of that company since January 1999. Prior to that time, Mr. McCormick served as an associate at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, an investment bank, from June 1997 to January 1999. In addition, Mr. McCormick has been a Director of Suntron Corporation since October 2001. Mr. McCormick holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the United States Military Academy and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

        Michael E. Moran has served as our Director since January 1999 and our Vice Chairman since June 1999. Mr. Moran has been a Managing Partner of Brockway Moran & Partners, Inc., a private equity investment firm, since September 2000. Mr. Moran was a founding partner of Brockway Moran & Partners, Inc. in January 1998. Mr. Moran served as a Senior Vice President at Trivest, Inc., a private equity investment firm, from 1994 to 1998. Mr. Moran previously served on the board of directors of ElectroStar, Inc., a publicly held printed circuit board manufacturing company that was sold to Tyco International in January 1997. Mr. Moran holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Drake University and a Master of Business Administration from DePaul University.

        Stacey M. Peterson has served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2000. From May 1998 to February 2000, Ms. Peterson served as Business Manager, ARCO Products Company at Atlantic Richfield Company, an oil and gas company. Prior to that time, Ms. Peterson served as Chief Financial Officer, from July 1996 to May 1998, and Controller, from November 1995 to July 1996, of PayPoint Business Unit of Atlantic Richfield Company. From August 1993 to November 1995, Ms. Peterson served as Financial Advisor, Corporate Finance at Atlantic Richfield Company. Ms. Peterson holds a Bachelor of Science in Applied Economics and Business Management from Cornell University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Pennsylvania, the Wharton School.

        O. Clay Swain has served as our Vice President, Sales and Marketing since September 2001, having served as our Vice President, Sales since June 2000 and as our National Sales Manager from March 2000. From July 1999 to February 2000, Mr. Swain served as General Manager of Tyco Printed Circuit Group, Logan Division, a publicly held printed circuit board manufacturing company. From January 1997 to June 1999, Mr. Swain served as Director of Sales of Tyco Printed Circuit Group. From December 1994 to December 1996, Mr. Swain served as National Sales Manager of

41

ElectroStar, Inc., previously a publicly held printed circuit board manufacturing company. Mr. Swain holds a Bachelor of Science and a Master in Business Administration from Utah State University.

        Shane S. Whiteside has served as our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since December 2002. From January 2001 to November 2002, Mr. Whiteside was the Vice President of Operations—Santa Ana Division and our Director of Operations—Santa Ana Division from July 1999 to December 2000. From March 1998 to June 1999, Mr. Whiteside was the Director of Operations of Power Circuits. Prior to joining Power Circuits, Mr. Whiteside was Product Manager for Technical USA from December 1996 to March 1998 and a Technical Sales Representative from September 1993 to December 1996. Mr. Whiteside holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of California at Irvine.

Management Fees And Agreements

        In 2000, we paid management fees for advisory services to three firms, T.C. Management, T.C. Management IV and Brockway Moran & Partners Management. These firms indirectly control our principal shareholder, Circuit Holdings, Inc. In consideration for advisory and management services rendered to us, we paid these firms an aggregate fee of $2.0 million upon consummation of our September 2000 initial public offering, which was accounted for as an offering cost. In addition, we used approximately $1.5 million of the net proceeds we received from our initial public offering to amend and consolidate the management agreements with Brockway Moran & Partners and Thayer Capital.

        Under the amended agreement, we no longer pay monthly management fees; however, we pay financial advisory fees of 1.5% of the first $50 million of proceeds or value of any transaction with respect to which these entities render services and 1% of any amount of proceeds or value in excess of $50 million. The agreement further provides that our obligation to pay financial advisory fees will terminate if, immediately prior to the closing of any transaction in respect of which these three entities render financial advisory services, these entities and their affiliates, on a combined basis, own less than 25% of our outstanding voting equity securities. We believe this arrangement is on terms no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

        We paid T.C. Management, T.C. Management IV and Brockway Moran & Partners Management a financial advisory fee of approximately $258,000 in connection with our secondary offering in February 2002. We paid T.C. Management, T.C. Management IV and Brockway Moran & Partners Management a financial advisory fee of approximately $500,000 in connection with our purchase of Advanced Circuits, Inc. in December 2002. We are not required to pay a financial advisory fee in connection with this offering.

Consulting Agreement

        During 2002, we had a consulting and management services agreement with an entity controlled by Kenneth L. Shirley, a former director of our company. The former director, through the entity, provided management and consulting services typical of those provided by a chief operating officer. We paid the entity approximately $168,000 for these services in 2002.

42

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

        The following table sets forth information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of July 31, 2003, as adjusted to reflect the sale of common stock in this offering by:

•

each shareholder known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock;



•

each selling shareholder;



•

each of the named executive officers;



•

each director of our company; and



•

all directors and executive officers as a group.